...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin >Transport Mechanism of Anthracycline Derivatives in Human Leukemia Cell Lines: Uptake and Efflux of Daunorubicin and Doxorubicin in HL60 and Its Resistant Cells and Comparison with Those of Pirarubicin
【24h】

Transport Mechanism of Anthracycline Derivatives in Human Leukemia Cell Lines: Uptake and Efflux of Daunorubicin and Doxorubicin in HL60 and Its Resistant Cells and Comparison with Those of Pirarubicin

机译:蒽环类衍生物在人类白血病细胞系中的转运机制:柔红霉素和阿霉素在HL60及其耐药细胞中的吸收和流出以及与吡柔比星的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We examined the transport mechanisms of daunorubicin (DNR) and doxorubicin (ADR) in HL60 and HL60/THP cells which were the non-P-glycoprotein-mcdiated resistant clone of the parent HL60 cells and showed a low degree of resistance, and compared them with those of pirarubicin (THP). In botli lines, it appeared that the uptakes of DNR and ADR were time-, temperature- and concentration-dependent and energy independent, and the transport of DNR consisted of saturable and nonsaturable components. They were pumped out from the cells time-, temperature- and energy-dependently. There were no differences in the accumulation amount of either DNR or ADR between HL60 and HL60/THP cells. Comparing the transport of DNR or ADR with that of THP, the uptake amounts of DNR and THP were approximately equal, and were greater than that of ADR in both types of cell. In m-inhibition experiments, DNR inhibited the THP uptake noncompetitively in the parent and resistant cells, in contradiction of the previously reported result in which ADR showed competitive inhibition (Nagasawa, K. et ?/., Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., in press). The THP accumulation appeared to be increased by preload of DNR and ADR, indicating a counter transport. Thus, DNR and ADR as well as THP might be incorporated via a common carrier-mediated transport system, but DNR uptake in part appeared to follow a nonsaturable transport, and its binding site in the carrier might differ from that of THP and ADR in both HL60 and HL60/THP cells.
机译:我们检查了柔红霉素(DNR)和阿霉素(ADR)在HL60和HL60 / THP细胞中的转运机制,HL60和HL60 / THP细胞是亲本HL60细胞的非P-糖蛋白介导的耐药克隆,并显示出较低的耐药性,并对其进行了比较与吡柔比星(THP)一样。在肉毒杆菌中,似乎DNR和ADR的吸收是时间,温度和浓度的依赖和能量的依赖,并且DNR的运输由可饱和和不可饱和的成分组成。它们是依赖于时间,温度和能量从细胞中抽出的。 HL60和HL60 / THP细胞之间DNR或ADR的积累量没有差异。比较DNR或ADR的转运与THP的转运,两种类型的细胞中DNR和THP的吸收量大致相等,并且大于ADR。在m抑制实验中,DNR非竞争性地抑制了亲本和耐药细胞中THP的吸收,这与先前报道的ADR表现出竞争性抑制的结果相矛盾(Nagasawa,K.等,Cancer Chemother。Pharmacol。,印刷中)。 TNR的积累似乎通过DNR和ADR的预加载而增加,表明是反向运输。因此,DNR和ADR以及THP可能通过共同的载体介导的转运系统掺入,但是DNR的吸收似乎部分遵循了不饱和转运,并且其在载体中的结合位点可能都与THP和ADR的结合位点不同HL60和HL60 / THP细胞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号