首页> 外文期刊>Nursing inquiry >Prognostic categories and timing of negative prognostic communication from critical care physicians to family members at end-of-life in an intensive care unit
【24h】

Prognostic categories and timing of negative prognostic communication from critical care physicians to family members at end-of-life in an intensive care unit

机译:重症监护病房临终时从重症监护医生到家庭成员的负面预后沟通的预后类别和时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Negative prognostic communication is often delayed in intensive care units, which limits time for families to prepare for end-of-life. This descriptive study, informed by ethnographic methods, was focused on exploring critical care physician communication of negative prognoses to families and identifying timing influences. Prognostic communication of critical care physicians to nurses and family members was observed and physicians and family members were interviewed. Physician perception of prognostic certainty, based on an accumulation of empirical data, and the perceived need for decision-making, drove the timing of prognostic communication, rather than family needs. Although prognoses were initially identified using intuitive knowledge for patients in one of the six identified prognostic categories, utilizing decision-making to drive prognostic communication resulted in delayed prognostic communication to families until end-of-life (EOL) decisions could be justified with empirical data. Providers will better meet the needs of families who desire earlier prognostic information by separating prognostic communication from decision-making and communicating the possibility of a poor prognosis based on intuitive knowledge, while acknowledging the uncertainty inherent in prognostication. This sets the stage for later prognostic discussions focused on EOL decisions, including limiting or withdrawing treatment, which can be timed when empirical data substantiate intuitive prognoses. This allows additional time for families to anticipate and prepare for end-of-life decision-making.
机译:在重症监护病房中,阴性的预后沟通常常会延迟,这限制了家庭为临终做准备的时间。这项描述性研究以人种学方法为基础,专注于探索对家庭不利预后的重症监护医师沟通,并确定时间影响。观察了重症监护医生与护士和家庭成员的预后交流,并采访了医生和家庭成员。基于经验数据的积累,医师对预后确定性的认识以及对决策的感知需求,推动了预后交流的时机,而不是家庭的需求。尽管最初使用六种已鉴定的预后类别之一中的患者的直觉知识来确定预后,但利用决策来推动预后交流会延迟与家庭的预后交流,直到可以用经验数据证明生命终结(EOL)决策为止。提供者可以通过将预后交流与决策分开,并基于直觉知识交流预后不良的可能性,同时承认预后固有的不确定性,从而更好地满足希望获得较早预后信息的家庭的需求。这为以后针对EOL决策的预后讨论奠定了基础,包括限制或退出治疗,当经验数据证实直观预后时可以及时进行。这为家庭提供了更多的时间来预期和为临终决策做准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号