【24h】

Comment.

机译:评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The development and revision of codes of ethics for nurses is not for the faint hearted. It is challenging to address a wide variety of areas of practice and to reconcile competing interests. Furthermore, in many countries health professions are under increased scrutiny by the governments that delegated formal authority to them (i.e. to professional colleges or associations) for licensure. Among the health professions the nursing profession seems to feel most vulnerable. This sense of vulnerability can lead to some degree of goal displacement in the development of a code of ethics, in which attention to ethics is minimized and replaced by a greater focus on rules. Rule orientated statements are perceived to be better tools for assessment in professional conduct hearings, thereby allowing nurses to 'police' themselves.
机译:制定和修订护士道德规范不是为胆小者准备的。解决广泛的实践领域并调和相互竞争的利益具有挑战性。此外,在许多国家,政府对卫生专业进行了越来越严格的审查,这些政府将正式授权下放给卫生专业(即专业学院或协会)以取得许可。在保健行业中,护理行业似乎最脆弱。这种脆弱感会在制定道德守则时导致某种程度的目标偏离,在道德守则中,对道德的关注程度会降至最低,而将注意力更多地放在规则上。在专业行为听证会上,以规则为基础的陈述被认为是评估的更好工具,从而使护士可以“自我警察”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nursing ethics》 |2010年第1期|共3页
  • 作者

    Storch JL;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 护理学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 12:53:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号