...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases: NMCD >Meta-analysis of 14 trials comparing bypass grafting vs drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
【24h】

Meta-analysis of 14 trials comparing bypass grafting vs drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

机译:糖尿病多发冠状动脉疾病患者14项旁路移植与药物洗脱支架比较试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and aim: Clinical trials have reported lower mortality and repeated revascularization rate in diabetic patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as compared to percutaneous revascularization. However, these studies were conducted in the era of bare-metal stents. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare CABG to PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) in diabetic patients with multivessel and/or left main disease. Methods and results: The literature was scanned by formal search of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases), and major international scientific session abstracts from 2000 to 2013. Primary endpoint was mortality. A total of 14 (4 randomized and 10 non-randomized) trials were finally included, with a total of 7072 patients. Up to 5 years follow-up, CABG was associated with a reduction in mortality (7.3% vs 10.4%, OR[95%CI]=0.65[0.55-0.77], p<0.0001; phet=0.00001), with similar results in both RCTs (OR[95%CI]=0.64[0.50-0.82], p=0.0005) and NRCTs (OR[95%CI]=0.75[0.6-0.94)], p=0.01) (p int=0.93). A significant relationship was observed between risk profile and benefits in mortality with CABG (p<0.001). CABG reduced target vessel revascularization (TVR; 5.2% vs 15.7%, OR[95%CI]=0.30[0.25-0.36], p<0.00001, p het=0.02), with a relationship between risk profile and the benefits from CABG as compared to DES (p<0.0001). CABG was associated with a lower rate of MACCE (14.9% vs 22.9%, OR[95%CI]=0.59[0.51-0.67], p<0.00001, p het<0.00001) but higher risk of CVA (3.6% vs 1.4%, OR[95%CI]=2.34[1.63-3.35], p<0.00001, p het=0.71). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrates that among diabetic patients with multivessel disease and/or left main disease, CABG provides benefits in mortality and TVR, especially in high-risk patients but it is counterbalanced by a higher risk of stroke. Future trials are certainly needed in the era of new DES and improved antiplatelet therapies.
机译:背景与目的:临床试验报道,与经皮血管重建术相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗的糖尿病患者的死亡率和重复血管重建率更低。但是,这些研究是在裸金属支架时代进行的。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较多支血管和/或左主干糖尿病患者的CABG与PCI与药物洗脱支架(DES)的比较。方法和结果:通过正式搜索电子数据库(Medline,EMBASE和Cochrane数据库)以及2000年至2013年的主要国际科学会议摘要对文献进行了扫描。主要终点是死亡率。最终共纳入14项试验(4项随机和10项非随机),共7072名患者。在长达5年的随访中,CABG与死亡率降低相关(7.3%比10.4%,OR [95%CI] = 0.65 [0.55-0.77],p <0.0001; phet = 0.00001),结果相似RCT(OR [95%CI] = 0.64 [0.50-0.82],p = 0.0005)和NRCT(OR [95%CI] = 0.75 [0.6-0.94)],p = 0.01)(p int = 0.93)。观察到CABG的风险特征与死亡率带来的显着相关性(p <0.001)。 CABG减少了靶血管的血运重建(TVR; 5.2%对15.7%,OR [95%CI] = 0.30 [0.25-0.36],p <0.00001,p het = 0.02),并且风险分布与CABG的获益之间存在相关性与DES相比(p <0.0001)。 CABG与MACCE发生率较低(14.9%vs 22.9%,OR [95%CI] = 0.59 [0.51-0.67],p <0.00001,p het <0.00001)相关,但CVA风险较高(3.6%vs 1.4%) ,或[95%CI] = 2.34 [1.63-3.35],p <0.00001,p het = 0.71)。结论:本荟萃分析表明,在患有多支血管疾病和/或左主干疾病的糖尿病患者中,CABG可以提高死亡率和TVR,特别是在高危患者中,但可以通过增加中风风险来抵消。在新的DES和改良的抗血小板治疗时代肯定需要进一步的试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号