...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Reviews >Science, law, and politics in FDA's genetically engineered foods policy: scientific concerns and uncertainties.
【24h】

Science, law, and politics in FDA's genetically engineered foods policy: scientific concerns and uncertainties.

机译:FDA基因工程食品政策中的科学,法律和政治:科学问题和不确定性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 1992 policy statement granted genetically engineered foods presumptive GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status. Since then, divergent views have been expressed concerning the scientific support for this policy. This paper examines four sources to better understand the basis for these claims: (1) internal FDA correspondence; (2) reports from the National Academy of Sciences; (3) research funded by US Department of Agriculture from 1981 to 2002; and (4) FDA's proposed rules issued in 2001. These sources reveal that little research has been conducted on unintended compositional changes from genetic engineering. Profiling techniques now make this feasible, but the new debate centers on the functional meaning of compositional changes..
机译:美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)1992年的政策声明授予转基因食品以假定的GRAS(通常被认为是安全的)地位。从那以后,对于这项政策的科学支持,人们表达了不同意见。本文研究了四个来源,以更好地理解这些主张的依据:(1)FDA内部通信; (2)美国国家科学院的报告; (3)1981年至2002年由美国农业部资助的研究; (4)FDA于2001年发布的拟议规则。这些资料表明,很少有人对基因工程的意外成分变化进行过研究。轮廓分析技术现在使这一点变得可行,但是新的争论集中在成分变化的功能含义上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号