首页> 外文期刊>Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B. Fundamentals: An International Journal of Computation and Methodology >A comparative assessment of the performance of mass conservation-based algorithms for incompressible multiphase flows
【24h】

A comparative assessment of the performance of mass conservation-based algorithms for incompressible multiphase flows

机译:基于质量守恒的不可压缩多相流算法性能的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This work is concerned with the implementation and testing, within a structured collocated finite-volume framework, of seven incompressible-segregated multiphase flow algorithms that belong to the mass conservation-based algorithms (MCBA) group in which the pressure-correction equation is derived from overall mass conservation. The pressure-correction schemes in these algorithms are based on SIMPLE, SIMPLEC, SIMPLEX, SIMPLEM, SIMPLEST, PISO, and PRIME. The performance and accuracy of the multiphase algorithms are assessed by solving eight one-dimensional two-phase flow problems spanning the spectrum from dilute bubbly to dense gas-solid flows. The main outcome of this study is a clear demonstration of the capability of all MCBA algorithms to deal with multiphase flow situations. Moreover, results displayed in terms of convergence history plots and CPU times indicate that the performance of the MCBA versions of SIMPLE, SIMPLEC, and SIMPLEX are very close. In general, the performance of SIMPLEST approaches that of SIMPLE for diffusion-dominated flows. As expected, the PRIME algorithm is found to be the most expensive, due to its explicit treatment of the phasic momentum equations. The PISO algorithm is generally more expensive than SIMPLE, and its performance depends on the type of flow and solution method used. The behavior of SIMPLEM is consistent, and in terms of CPU effort it stands between PRIME and SIMPLE. [References: 26]
机译:这项工作涉及在结构化的并置有限体积框架内实施和测试属于基于质量守恒的算法(MCBA)组的七个不可压缩的分离多相流算法,其中压力校正方程式源自整体质量守恒。这些算法中的压力校正方案基于SIMPLE,SIMPLEC,SIMPLEX,SIMPLEM,SIMPLEST,PISO和PRIME。通过解决八个一维两相流问题,评估了多相算法的性能和准确性,这些问题涵盖了从稀泡状流到稠密气固流的整个频谱。这项研究的主要成果是清楚证明了所有MCBA算法处理多相流情况的能力。此外,根据收敛历史图和CPU时间显示的结果表明,MCPLE版本的SIMPLE,SIMPLEC和SIMPLEX的性能非常接近。通常,对于扩散为主的流,SIMPLEST的性能接近SIMPLE。不出所料,由于对相位动量方程的显式处理,PRIME算法被认为是最昂贵的。 PISO算法通常比SIMPLE昂贵,并且PISO算法的性能取决于所使用的流程类型和求解方法。 SIMPLEM的行为是一致的,就CPU工作量而言,它介于PRIME和SIMPLE之间。 [参考:26]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号