首页> 外文期刊>Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B. Fundamentals: An International Journal of Computation and Methodology >Large-eddy simulation of the Sydney swirling nonpremixed flame and validation of several subgrid-scale models
【24h】

Large-eddy simulation of the Sydney swirling nonpremixed flame and validation of several subgrid-scale models

机译:悉尼旋流非预混火焰的大涡模拟和几个亚网格规模模型的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A methane-air swirling diffusion flame is studied by large-eddy simulation (LES) using second-order moment (SOM) and simplified PDF subgrid-scale (SGS) combustion models, Smagorinsky-Lilly and dynamic kinetic energy (DKE) subgrid-scale ( SGS) stress models. The predictions are validated by the experimental data. For LES statistics, comparison of the predicted axial and tangential time-averaged and root-mean-square (RMS) fluctuation velocities, temperature, RMS fluctuation temperature, CO2 and H2O mass fractions with the experimental results shows that all of the SGS models adopted here give results with only slight differences, but the DKE+SOM models are somewhat better than other SGS models. For instantaneous results, the predicted flame shape with a neck region is in agreement with that observed in experiments. The predicted flame shape and length obtained using the DKE+SOM models are better than those obtained using other SGS models. There are both large-scale and small-scale structures in the swirling flame; combustion reduces the large-scale structures and enhances the small-scale structures.
机译:通过使用第二阶矩(SOM)和简化的PDF亚网格规模(SGS)燃烧模型,Smagorinsky-Lilly和动态动能(DKE)亚网格规模的大涡模拟(LES)研究了甲烷-空气旋流扩散火焰(SGS)应力模型。这些预测已通过实验数据验证。对于LES统计数据,将预测的轴向和切向时间平均以及均方根(RMS)波动速度,温度,RMS波动温度,CO2和H2O质量分数与实验结果进行比较,表明此处采用的所有SGS模型给出的结果只有很小的差异,但是DKE + SOM模型比其他SGS模型要好一些。对于瞬时结果,带有颈部区域的预测火焰形状与实验中观察到的一致。使用DKE + SOM模型获得的预测火焰形状和长度比使用其他SGS模型获得的预测火焰形状和长度更好。旋转火焰中既有大型结构,也有小型结构。燃烧减少了大型结构并增强了小型结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号