...
首页> 外文期刊>New Zealand Journal of Ecology >Native bird abundance after Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen) removal from localised areas of high resource availability
【24h】

Native bird abundance after Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen) removal from localised areas of high resource availability

机译:从资源利用率高的局部地区移出澳大利亚喜((Gymnorhina tibicen)后,当地鸟类数量丰富

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many reports exist of Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) attacking and sometimes killing other birds. One study concluded that magpies had little impact on the abundance of other birds at landscape scales, but another found that birds (mainly exotic species) avoided flying or landing close to them. We assessed whether continuously removing magpies for 6 weeks from localised areas of high resource availability (e.g. bush remnants or private gardens with fruit- or nectar-producing trees) in ruralareas increased visitations by native birds compared with similar sites where magpies were not removed. Three count methods were used to estimate bird abundance: five-minute bird counts and ‘slow-walk’ transects in bush remnants, and five-minute bird counts and ‘snapshot’ counts in gardens. Generally, the abundance of native birds did not increase in treatment areas after magpie removal. In bush remnants, transect counts were typically better at detecting the presence of most species compared with five-minute bird counts. In gardens, snapshot counts were better at detecting tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) while five-minute bird counts were better at detecting magpies. Despite these differences, the different bird counting methods were generallyin agreement and revealed that magpies had little impact on native birds at the scale we examined.
机译:有许多报道称澳大利亚喜pies(Gymnorhina tibicen)袭击并杀死其他鸟类。一项研究得出的结论是,喜landscape对景观尺度上的其他鸟类的数量几乎没有影响,但另一项研究则发现鸟类(主要是外来物种)避免在其附近飞行或着陆。我们评估了在农村地区从资源利用率高的本地区域(例如灌木丛残留物或有果树或花蜜生产树的私人花园)连续清除喜pies 6周,与未清除喜pies的类似地点相比,当地鸟类的访视增加了。三种计数方法用于估算鸟类的丰度:灌木残留物中的五分钟鸟类计数和“慢走”样带,花园中的五分钟鸟类计数和“快照”计数。通常,去除喜after后,治疗区域的本地鸟类数量并未增加。与五分钟的鸟类计数相比,在灌木丛残留物中,横断面计数通常能更好地检测大多数物种的存在。在花园中,快照数量更适合检测tu(Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae),而五分钟鸟类数量更适合检测喜pies。尽管存在这些差异,但不同的鸟类计数方法大体上是一致的,并显示喜pies对我们研究的规模的本地鸟类影响不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号