...
首页> 外文期刊>New Zealand Journal of Ecology >Ecology after 100 years: Progress and pseudo-progress
【24h】

Ecology after 100 years: Progress and pseudo-progress

机译:100年后的生态:进步与伪进步

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Has the science of ecology fulfilled the promises made by the originators of ecological science at the start of the last century? What should ecology achieve? Have good policies for environmental management flowed out of ecological science? These important questions are rarely discussed by ecologists working on detailed studies of individual systems. Until we decide what we wish to achieve as ecologists we cannot define progress toward those goals. Ecologists desire to achieve an understanding of how the natural world operates, how humans have modified the natural world, and how to alleviate problems arising from human actions. Ecologists have made impressive gains over the past century in achieving these goals, but this progress has been uneven. Some sub-disciplines of ecology are well developed empirically and theoretically, while others languish for reasons that are not always clear. Fundamental problems can be lost to view as ecologists fiddle with unimportant pseudo-problems. Bandwagons develop and disappear with limited success in addressing problems. The public demands progress from all the sciences, and as time moves along and problems get worse, more rapid progress is demanded. The result for ecology has too often been poor, short-term science and poor management decisions. But since the science is rarely repeated and the management results may be a generation or two down the line, it is difficult for the public or for scientists to decide how good or bad the scientific advice has been. In ecology over the past 100 years we have made solid achievements in behavioural ecology, population dynamics, and ecological methods, we have made some progress in understanding community and ecosystem dynamics, but we have made less useful progress in developing theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, and natural resource management. The key to increasing progress is to adopt a systems approach with explicit hypotheses, theoretical models, and field experiments on a scale defined by the problem. With continuous feedback between problems, possible solutions, relevant theory and experimental data we can achieve our scientific goals.
机译:生态学是否履行了上世纪初生态学创始人的许诺?生态学应该实现什么?好的环境管理政策是否源于生态科学?生态学家很少对单个系统进行详细研究,而很少讨论这些重要问题。在我们确定要成为生态学家的目标之前,我们无法确定实现这些目标的进度。生态学家希望了解自然界的运作方式,人类如何改变自然界以及如何减轻人类行为引起的问题。在过去的一个世纪中,生态学家在实现这些目标方面取得了令人瞩目的成就,但是这一进展并不平衡。生态学的一些学科在经验和理论上都得到了很好的发展,而另一些学科却由于并不总是很清楚的原因而折。当生态学家摆弄一些不重要的伪问题时,根本的问题可能会丢失。潮流发展和消失,解决问题的成功有限。公众要求所有科学领域的进步,并且随着时间的流逝和问题的恶化,要求更快的进步。生态的结果往往是糟糕的,短期的科学和糟糕的管理决策。但是,由于科学很少重复,管理结果可能会持续一代或两代,因此公众或科学家很难确定科学建议的优劣。在过去的100年的生态学中,我们在行为生态学,种群动态和生态方法方面取得了坚实的成就,在理解社区和生态系统动态方面取得了一些进展,但是在发展理论生态学,景观生态学,和自然资源管理。取得进展的关键是采用系统方法,以明确的假设,理论模型和现场实验来解决问题。通过问题,可能的解决方案,相关理论和实验数据之间的不断反馈,我们可以实现我们的科学目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号