首页> 外文期刊>American journal of otolaryngology >Characterization of litigation after tonsillectomy in the United States
【24h】

Characterization of litigation after tonsillectomy in the United States

机译:美国扁桃体切除术后诉讼的特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Background: Tonsillectomy is a common procedure performed for both adults and children. When unfavorable outcomes occur during perioperative events, patients may seek compensation through medical malpractice or medical negligence litigation. An understanding of these cases can help physicians and involved health care providers avoid risk and improve patient satisfaction. The aims of this study were to identify reasons for litigation after tonsillectomy and to examine outcomes of tonsillectomy-related litigation in the United States. Methods: All available court decisions associated with medical malpractice and negligence after tonsillectomy in the Westlaw Campus Research legal database were reviewed. The plaintiff’ relationship to the patient, patient characteristics, state where the tonsillectomy took place, specialty of the defendant(s), allegations, and adjudicated case outcomes were obtained from case documents and analyzed. Results: Forty-two relevant judicial opinions written between 1986 and 2020 in 24 states were included. Twenty-two (52.4 ) of the cases involved female patients, and 24 (57.1 ) involved pediatric patients. Otolaryngology, anesthesiology, primary care, emergency medicine, orthodontics, and pharmacy were the disciplines involved in the negligence claims. Claims involved postoperative management in 18 (42.9 ) of the cases and intraoperative misadventure in 17 (40.5 ) of the cases. Six (14.3 ) of the 42 patients experienced an anesthesia complication, and 11 (26.2 ) experienced a surgical complication. Eleven (26.2 ) patients experienced postoperative bleeding. All cases involved postoperative concerns, and death occurred in 14 (33.3 ) of the patients. Overall, 21 (45.7 ) of the rulings were for the defendant. Conclusions: Postoperative management and intraoperative misadventure are commonly cited reasons for legal action after tonsillectomy procedures in the United States. All litigation surrounding tonsillectomy arose if concerns were present postoperatively. Thorough communication and attentive postoperative management are critical in order to avoid complications and patient injury, including death, associated with tonsillectomy.
机译:?2022 Elsevier Inc.背景:扁桃体切除术是成人和儿童的常见手术。当围手术期发生不良后果时,患者可以通过医疗事故或医疗过失诉讼寻求赔偿。了解这些病例可以帮助医生和相关医疗保健提供者规避风险并提高患者满意度。本研究的目的是确定扁桃体切除术后诉讼的原因,并检查美国扁桃体切除术相关诉讼的结果。方法:审查了Westlaw Campus Research法律数据库中与扁桃体切除术后医疗事故和疏忽相关的所有可用法院判决。原告与患者的关系、患者特征、扁桃体切除术的地点、被告的专业、指控和裁决的案件结果均从案件文件中获得并进行了分析。结果:纳入了1986年至2020年间在24个州撰写的42份相关司法意见。其中22例(52.4%)为女性患者,24例(57.1%)为儿科患者。耳鼻喉科、麻醉学、初级保健、急诊医学、正畸学和药学是疏忽索赔涉及的学科。18例(42.9%)的索赔涉及术后管理,17例(40.5%)涉及术中意外事故。六 (14.42例患者中有3%出现麻醉并发症,11例(26.2%)出现手术并发症。11例(26.2%)患者出现术后出血。所有病例均涉及术后问题,其中14例(33.3%)患者死亡。总体而言,21项(45.7%)的裁决是针对被告的。结论:在美国,扁桃体切除术后,术后管理和术中不幸事件是通常被引用的法律诉讼原因。如果术后存在担忧,则所有围绕扁桃体切除术的诉讼都会出现。彻底的沟通和周到的术后管理对于避免与扁桃体切除术相关的并发症和患者伤害(包括死亡)至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号