...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Medicine Communications >Validation of image-derived arterial input functions at the femoral artery using 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography.
【24h】

Validation of image-derived arterial input functions at the femoral artery using 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography.

机译:使用18 F-氟化物正电子发射断层扫描技术验证股动脉图像来源的动脉输入功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The use of image-derived arterial input functions (IDAIF) for the dynamic quantification of bone metabolism using 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography 18F-PET is an attractive alternative to direct arterial blood sampling. PURPOSES: (a) To validate a method for obtaining the IDAIF by imaging the femoral artery against a method for deriving the IDAIF at the aorta that was previously validated against direct arterial sampling. (b) To compare the accuracy of bone plasma clearance measurements (Ki) at the total hip site obtained using the femoral artery IDAIF against Ki values at the same site obtained using the aorta IDAIF. METHODS: Twelve healthy postmenopausal women with a mean age of 62.6 years (range, 52.3-70.6 years) had 60-min dynamic 18F-PET scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur 2 weeks apart. The femoral artery IDAIF was obtained from the proximal femur scan using four different algorithms: (a) fixed partial volume correction (PVC) method; (b) variable PVC method; (c) Chen method; and (d) Cook-Lodge method. The aorta IDAIF was obtained from the lumbar spine scan using a previously validated method and the respective Ki values in the hip were used to assess the performance of each of the femoral artery algorithms. RESULTS: When the femoral artery IDAIF methods were compared with the aorta IDAIF in terms of the area under the curve AUC values calculated in 4-min time intervals over 0-60 min, the absolute root mean square errors were: (a) fixed PVC, 0.52; (b) variable PVC, 0.54; (c) Chen, 0.72; and (d) Cook-Lodge, 0.49 in MBq s/ml. There were small, but statistically significant differences, in the Ki values found by all four femoral artery IDAIF methods when compared with the figures obtained using the aorta IDAIF. Bland-Altman plots of Ki values showed the best agreement for the fixed PVC method with a standard deviation of 0.0020 ml/min/ml, followed by variable PVC, Cook-Lodge and Chen method with standard deviations of 0.0022, 0.0024 and 0.0042 ml/min/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that it is possible to measure regional bone turnover at the hip without the need to perform direct arterial sampling to acquire the arterial input function (AIF). The differences in the Ki values obtained at the hip by using aorta IDAIF and any of the four image-based AIF methods at the femoral artery were small and clinically insignificant. The performance of fixed PVC, variable PVC and Cook-Lodge method was similar although the latter was less robust than the other two methods.
机译:简介:使用图像来源的动脉输入功能(IDAIF)通过18F-氟化物正电子发射断层显像18F-PET对骨代谢进行动态量化是直接动脉血液采样的一种有吸引力的替代方法。目的:(a)验证一种针对股动脉成像的IDAIF的方法,该方法相对于先前已针对直接动脉采样进行验证的主动脉IDAIF的推导方法。 (b)比较使用股动脉IDAIF获得的整个髋关节部位的骨血浆清除率测量(Ki)与使用主动脉IDAIF获得的相同部位的Ki值的准确性。方法:十二名健康的绝经后妇女平均年龄为62.6岁(范围为52.3-70.6岁),每隔2周进行60分钟的腰椎和股骨近端动态18F-PET扫描。股动脉IDAIF是使用四种不同的算法从股骨近端扫描获得的:(a)固定局部容积校正(PVC)方法; (b)可变聚氯乙烯法; (c)陈法; (d)Cook-Lodge方法。使用先前验证的方法从腰椎扫描中获得主动脉IDAIF,并将髋部的各个Ki值用于评估每种股动脉算法的性能。结果:将股动脉IDAIF方法与主动脉IDAIF方法在0-60分钟内以4分钟的时间间隔计算的曲线AUC值下面积进行比较时,绝对均方根误差为:(a)固定PVC ,0.52; (b)可变聚氯乙烯,0.54; (c)陈0.72; (d)Cook-Lodge,0.49 MBq s / ml。与使用主动脉IDAIF获得的数据相比,所有四种股动脉IDAIF方法发现的Ki值均存在微小差异,但在统计学上具有显着差异。 Ki值的Bland-Altman图显示了固定PVC方法的最佳一致性,标准偏差为0.0020 ml / min / ml,其次是可变PVC,Cook-Lodge和Chen方法,标准偏差为0.0022、0.0024和0.0042 ml /分钟/毫升。结论:我们已经证明,无需进行直接动脉采样即可获取动脉输入功能(AIF),就可以测量髋部区域性骨转换。通过使用主动脉IDAIF和四种基于图像的AIF方法在股动脉处获得的髋关节Ki值差异很小,在临床上可忽略不计。固定PVC,可变PVC和Cook-Lodge方法的性能相似,尽管后者的稳定性不如其他两种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号