...
首页> 外文期刊>North American Journal of Fisheries Management >Effectiveness of Continuous versus Point Electrofishing for Fish Assemblage Assessment in Shallow, Turbid Aquatic Habitats
【24h】

Effectiveness of Continuous versus Point Electrofishing for Fish Assemblage Assessment in Shallow, Turbid Aquatic Habitats

机译:在浅水,浑浊水生生境中连续捕捞与点钓电钓鱼对鱼群评估的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We evaluated the relative effectiveness of continuous versus point electrofishing methods for describing fish assemblage metrics in the lower Atchafalaya River Floodway system, Louisiana. Continuous data were collected by boat electrofishing opposing shores of a 100-m reach for a total of 480 s. Point data were collected in an adjacent 100-m reach by boat electrofishing for 60 s at four points (240 s total) at 25-m intervals on alternating shorelines. We tested for significant differences between the methods with a linear model for species richness and CPUE (fish/min) and a generalized linear model for species diversity. We also compared the length frequencies of Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides between methods. We found no difference in diversity between methods but significantly higher species richness (mean = 1.46 species) and significantly lower CPUE (mean = -24.63 fish/min) for continuous electrofishing. We found no difference in Largemouth Bass length frequency between methods, but point electrofishing captured more individuals between 300 and 400 mm. Our results indicate that point electrofishing may be an efficient, effective technique for capturing target species and larger individuals that may otherwise avoid capture. When coupled with continuous electrofishing, point electrofishing may bolster assemblage and population size structure data, particularly in shallow, turbid environments.
机译:我们评估了连续电捕鱼法和点电捕鱼法在描述路易斯安那州下阿察法拉雅河洪水道系统中的鱼群指标时的相对有效性。连续的数据是通过在距离100米的对岸划船电钓总共480 s来收集的。通过在交替的海岸线上以25 m的间隔在四个点(共240 s)在四个点进行60 s的电钓鱼,在相邻的100 m范围内收集点数据。我们使用物种丰富度和CPUE(鱼类/分钟)的线性模型与物种多样性的广义线性模型之间的显着性差异进行了测试。我们还比较了两种方法之间大嘴鲈鱼的长度频率。我们发现方法之间的多样性没有差异,但是连续电钓鱼的物种丰富度(平均值= 1.46种)显着较高,而CPUE显着降低(平均值= -24.63鱼/分钟)。我们发现两种方法的大嘴鲈鱼长度频率没有差异,但是点状电钓鱼捕获了300至400毫米之间的更多个体。我们的结果表明,点状电钓鱼可能是一种有效,有效的技术,可以捕获目标物种和其他可能避免捕获的较大个体。当与连续的电钓鱼一起使用时,点电钓鱼可能会增强组合和种群大小的结构数据,尤其是在浅而浑浊的环境中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号