首页> 外文期刊>North American Journal of Fisheries Management >Deep Hooking and Angling Success When Passively and Actively Fishing for Stream-Dwelling Trout with Baited J and Circle Hooks
【24h】

Deep Hooking and Angling Success When Passively and Actively Fishing for Stream-Dwelling Trout with Baited J and Circle Hooks

机译:诱饵J和圈钩被动和主动捕鱼溪流鳟鱼时,深钩成功

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Circle hooks are becoming commonplace in recreational fisheries because they often reduce deep hooking, but there has been little evaluation of their effectiveness in trout fisheries. To compare the occurrence of deep hooking and angling success ratesfor stream-dwelling trout, we used three baited hook types (i.e., inline circle hooks, inline J hooks, and 4°-offset J hooks) fished with two angling methods (i.e., active fishing, using a traditional bait fishing hook set; and passive fishing, with nosharp hook set). Of the 583 wild trout caught by anglers, 20% were deep hooked. The deep hooking rate varied by hook type and angling method, but the interaction term hook type x angling method was statistically significant, indicating that the effect of hook type could not be interpreted separately from fishing method. Accordingly, the occurrence of deep hooking was significantly greater for offset J hooks fished passively (28 ±9% [95% CI about the mean]) and inline J hooks fished actively (27 ± 9%)than for offset J hooks fished actively (9 ± 6%) and inline circle hooks fished actively (10 ±6%). Fish length affected deep-hooking rates, such that trout smaller than 250 mm were less likely to be deeply hooked than trout 250-350 mm in length. Hooking success (i.e., successful hook-ups divided by strikes) was greatest for actively fished inline J hooks (75 ±7%), lowest for passively fished inline circle hooks (45 ± 6%) and passively fished offset J hooks (48 ±8%), and always greater for activelyfished hooks than for passively fished hooks of the same type. We found deep hooking was nearly twice as likely for inline circle hooks when fished according to manufacturers' recommendations (i.e., passively) than when fished actively. These results and those of others suggest that fishing circle hooks actively when bait fishing for stream-dwelling trout will result in less deep hooking than fishing circle hooks passively.
机译:圆钩在休闲渔业中正变得司空见惯,因为它们通常减少深钩,但很少有人评价它们在鳟鱼渔业中的有效性。为了比较溪流鳟鱼深钩和成钩成功率的发生率,我们使用了两种诱饵方法(即主动式)钓到的三种诱饵钩类型(即,内圆钩,内J钩和4°偏移J钩)。钓鱼,使用传统的诱饵钓鱼钩套装;被动钓鱼,使用nosharp钓鱼钩套装)。在垂钓者捕获的583条野鳟中,有20%被深深钩住。深钩率因钩型和垂钓方法而异,但相互作用项钩型x垂钓方法具有统计学意义,表明钩型的影响无法与钓鱼方法分开解释。因此,被动钓鱼的偏移J钩(28±9%[平均值的95%CI])和主动钓鱼的直列J钩(27±9%)的深钩发生比主动钓鱼(29±9%)大得多。 9±6%)和鱼线钩(10±6%)。鱼的长度影响深钩率,因此小于250 mm的鳟鱼比深250-350 mm的鳟鱼更不会被深深地钩住。钩钓成功率(即成功的钩扣除以罢工)对于主动钓鱼的直列J钩最大(75±7%),对于被动钓鱼的直列圆钩(45±6%)和被动钓鱼的偏置J钩(48± 8%),并且主动钓钩总是比相同类型的被动钓钩更大。我们发现,根据制造商的建议(即被动地)进行捕捞时,深圈钩捕的可能性几乎是内圈捕捞的两倍于主动捕捞。这些结果和其他结果表明,诱饵钓流栖鳟鱼时,钓圈会主动钓钩,比被动钓圈会更深。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号