...
首页> 外文期刊>North American Journal of Fisheries Management >Use of a Statewide Angler Tag Reporting System to Estimate Rates of Exploitation and Total Mortality for Idaho Sport Fisheries
【24h】

Use of a Statewide Angler Tag Reporting System to Estimate Rates of Exploitation and Total Mortality for Idaho Sport Fisheries

机译:使用全州垂钓者标签报告系统来估算爱达荷州体育渔业的开采率和总死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

From 2006 to 2009, 18,712 fish were tagged and released in 45 tagging events using nonreward and high-reward T-bar anchor tags to estimate the rate of exploitation (u) by anglers in various Idaho fisheries. In total, 3,100 nonreward tags and 592 high-reward tags were reported by anglers. Annual u was adjusted for tag loss, tagging mortality, and angler tag reporting rate. Tag loss, estimated by double-tagging a subsample of fish, varied greatly among species; tag loss was lowest for Yellow Perch Perca flavescens (1.1% in year 1 and 4.5% in year 2) and crappies Pomoxis spp. (2.9% and 4.8%) and was highest for Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides (14.8% and 30.3%), Walleyes Sander vitreus (11.4% and 43.2%), and Smallmouth Bass M. dolomieu (10.5% and 41.6%). Short-term (7-33-d) mortality averaged about 1% for both hatchery and wild fish. The nonreward-tag reporting rate averaged 54.5% across all species and years. Adjusted u averaged 19.4% (range = 2.0-44.3%) and was generally highest for crappies (mean = 28.7%) and Smallmouth Bass (22.0%) and lowest for wild trout (9.5%). Estimates of total annual mortality (A), based on the difference in tag returns between years 1 and 2, were plausible for some species but were unusually high for other species, especially Smallmouth Bass and wild trout. The implausibility of some estimates of A probably resulted from a combination of factors, including the reduced vulnerability of larger, older fish to angling, which would have caused a reduction in tag returns in year 2, likely due to a shift in fish behavior or habitat preference as tagged fish grew in size. Our results demonstrate the utility of using the high-reward tagging method to estimate u for fisheries under a variety of circumstances, but fisheries managers should use caution in attempting to simultaneously estimate A from the tag returns.
机译:从2006年到2009年,使用非奖励性和高奖励性T型锚标签在45个标签事件中标记并释放了18,712条鱼,以估算爱达荷州各个渔业中钓鱼者的剥削率(u)。钓鱼者总共报告了3,100个非奖励标签和592个高奖励标签。调整了年度u的标签丢失,标签死亡率和钓鱼者标签报告率。通过对鱼的一个子样本进行双标签来估计的标签损失在物种之间差异很大。黄鲈(Perca flavescens)和第2年的蔓越莓(Pomoxis spp)的标签损失最低(第一年为1.1%,第二年为4.5%)。 (2.9%和4.8%),最高的是大嘴鲈鱼(14.8%和30.3%),Walleyes Sander玻璃体(11.4%和43.2%)和小嘴鲈鱼(10.5%和41.6%)。孵化场和野生鱼类的短期(7-33-d)死亡率平均约为1%。所有物种和年份的非奖励标签报告率平均为54.5%。调整后的u平均为19.4%(范围= 2.0-44.3%),通常对于cr头(平均值= 28.7%)和小嘴鲈鱼(22.0%)最高,而野鳟鱼最低(9.5%)。基于第1年和第2年标签返回值的差异,对总年死亡率的估算(A)对于某些物种而言似乎是合理的,但对于其他物种,尤其是小嘴鲈鱼和野鳟鱼,则异常高。某些估计值A的估计不合理,可能是由于多种因素共同作用的结果,包括较大的较旧的鱼类更容易垂钓,这将导致第2年标签收益减少,这可能是由于鱼类行为或栖息地的变化喜好,因为带标签的鱼的尺寸越来越大。我们的结果证明了在各种情况下使用高奖励标签法估算渔业u的效用,但是渔业管理人员在尝试从标签收益中同时估算A时应谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号