首页> 外文期刊>Nonlinear processes in geophysics >Testing the performance of three nonlinear methods of time series analysis for prediction and downscaling of European daily temperatures
【24h】

Testing the performance of three nonlinear methods of time series analysis for prediction and downscaling of European daily temperatures

机译:测试三种非线性时间序列分析方法的性能,以预测和降低欧洲日温度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigated the usability of the method of local linear models (LLM), multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP NN) and radial basis function neural network (RBF NN) for the construction of temporal and spatial transfer functions between different meteorological quantities, and compared the obtained results both mutually and to the results of multiple linear regression (MLR). The tested methods were applied for the short-term prediction of daily mean temperatures and for the downscaling of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data, using series of daily mean, minimum and maximum temperatures from 25 European stations as predictands. None of the tested nonlinear methods was recognized to be distinctly superior to the others, but all nonlinear techniques proved to be better than linear regression in the majority of the cases. It is also discussed that the most frequently used nonlinear method, the MLP neural network, may not be the best choice for processing the climatic time series LLM method or RBF NNs can offer a comparable or slightly better performance and they do not suffer from some of the practical disadvantages of MLPs.
机译:我们研究了局部线性模型(LLM),多层感知器神经网络(MLP NN)和径向基函数神经网络(RBF NN)方法在不同气象量之间时空传递函数的构造的可用性,并比较了相互之间以及多重线性回归(MLR)的结果。使用来自25个欧洲站点的每日平均温度,最低和最高温度系列作为预测值,将经测试的方法用于短期平均日气温预测和NCEP / NCAR再分析数据的缩减。没有一个被测试的非线性方法被认为是明显优于其他方法,但是在大多数情况下,所有非线性技术都被证明比线性回归更好。还讨论了最常用的非线性方法MLP神经网络可能不是处理气候时间序列LLM方法的最佳选择,否则RBF NN可以提供相当的性能或稍好一些,并且它们不会遭受某些MLP的实际缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号