...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgical review. >Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough theory: a reappraisal after 35 years
【24h】

Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough theory: a reappraisal after 35 years

机译:正常灌注压突破理论:35年后的重新评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The intrinsic ability of the brain to maintain constant cerebral blood flow (CBF) is known as cerebral pressure autoregulation. This ability protects the brain against cerebral ischemia and hyperemia within a certain range of blood pressures. The normal perfusion pressure breakthrough (NPPB) theory described by Spetzler in 1978 was adopted to explain the edema and hemorrhage that sometimes occur after resection of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The underlying pathophysiology of edema and hemorrhage after AVM resection still remains controversial. Over the last three decades, advances in neuroimaging, CBF, and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) measurement have both favored and contradicted the NBBP theory. At the same time, other theories have been proposed, including the occlusive hyperemia theory. We believe that both theories are related and complementary and that they both explain changes in hemodynamics after AVM resection. The purpose of this work is to review the current status of the NBBP theory 35 years after its original description.
机译:大脑维持恒定脑血流量(CBF)的内在能力被称为脑压自动调节。此功能可在一定范围的血压范围内保护大脑免受脑缺血和充血的影响。 Spetzler在1978年描述的正常灌注压力突破(NPPB)理论被用来解释脑动静脉畸形(AVM)切除后有时发生的水肿和出血。 AVM切除术后水肿和出血的潜在病理生理学仍存在争议。在过去的三十年中,神经影像学,CBF和脑灌注压(CPP)测量的进步既有利又与NBBP理论相矛盾。同时,还提出了其他理论,包括闭塞性充血理论。我们相信这两种理论是相关的和互补的,并且它们都可以解释AVM切除后血液动力学的变化。这项工作的目的是回顾NBBP理论在其原始描述后35年的现状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号