首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgery >Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery.
【24h】

Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery.

机译:交互式图像引导开颅手术的临床效用和成本效益:常规和图像引导脑膜瘤手术的临床比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Although interactive image guidance has been determined to be an increasingly important and reliable tool in contemporary neurosurgery, the clinical results and cost-effectiveness of the use of these systems, compared with conventional techniques, remain understudied. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible benefits of image-guided craniotomies to treat meningiomas, in terms of hospital stays, surgical complications, and, consequently, cost-effectiveness, compared with the results of standard surgery (SS). METHODS: During a 3.5-year period, 100 patients were surgically treated for meningiomas using image-guided surgery (IGS) with neuronavigation assistance and 170 were surgically treated using SS. From the consecutive series of the 100 IGS cases, it was possible to statistically match 50 (in terms of the demographic data, the location and size of the tumor, and the experience of the surgeon) with 50 SS cases. The clinical data were collected prospectively for the IGS group and retrospectively for the SS group. RESULTS: The anesthetic (operation) times were similar for the two groups, although surgical times were shorter for the IGS group (P = 0.02). Blood loss during surgery was less for the IGS group (although not statistically significantly, P > 0.05), but more SS cases required transfusions (P = 0.03). The mean intensive therapy unit stay was 1.7 days for the SS group and 1 day for the IGS group (P = 0.12); the mean hospital stays were 13.5 and 8.5 days, respectively (P = 0.017). Severe complications (permanent or requiring additional surgical procedures) were encountered in 14% of the cases in the SS group and 6% of the cases in the IGS group (P = 0.019), whereas the rates of minor complications (resolved within 30 d without further surgery) were similar (8 and 10%, respectively). The most common problems for the control group were postoperative hematomas (n = 3), which required urgent surgery in two cases; intractable postoperative swelling was treated by lobectomy in another case. In the IGS group, the two severe complications included one case of an infected bone flap and one case of a new permanent neurological deficit. The mean cost per patient was approximately 20% higher for SS than for IGS. CONCLUSION: Although this was not a randomized study, the analysis of these results strongly suggests a positive effect of neuronavigation on the complication rate and thus on intensive care unit and hospital stays, with attendant financial implications.
机译:目的:尽管交互式图像导航已被确定为现代神经外科手术中越来越重要和可靠的工具,但与传统技术相比,使用这些系统的临床结果和成本效益仍未得到研究。这项研究的目的是研究与常规手术(SS)相比,影像引导开颅手术治疗脑膜瘤的可能益处,包括住院时间,手术并发症以及因此的成本效益。方法:在3.5年的时间里,采用神经导航辅助的图像引导手术(IGS)对100例脑膜瘤进行手术治疗,并采用SS进行手术治疗170例。从连续的100例IGS病例中,可以统计地将50例SS病例与50例(就人口统计学数据,肿瘤的位置和大小以及外科医生的经验而言)相匹配。前瞻性收集IGS组的临床数据,回顾性收集SS组的临床数据。结果:两组的麻醉(手术)时间相似,但IGS组的手术时间较短(P = 0.02)。对于IGS组,手术期间失血较少(尽管无统计学意义,P> 0.05),但更多SS病例需要输血(P = 0.03)。 SS组平均强化治疗时间为1.7天,IGS组平均为1天(P = 0.12)。平均住院时间分别为13.5天和8.5天(P = 0.017)。 SS组和IGS组分别有14%和6%的病例出现严重并发症(永久性或需要额外的外科手术)(P = 0.019),而轻度并发症的发生率(在30 d内就解决了)进一步手术)相似(分别为8%和10%)。对照组最常见的问题是术后血肿(n = 3),其中有2例需要紧急手术。在另一例中,通过肺叶切除术治疗了顽固的术后肿胀。在IGS组中,两种严重并发症包括1例被感染的骨瓣和1例新的永久性神经功能缺损。 SS的平均每位患者成本比IGS高约20%。结论:尽管这不是一项随机研究,但对这些结果的分析强烈表明,神经导航对并发症发生率有积极作用,因此对重症监护病房和住院时间也有积极作用,并伴有财务影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号