...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews >Dissociating memory traces and scenario construction in mental time travel
【24h】

Dissociating memory traces and scenario construction in mental time travel

机译:在心理时间旅行中分离记忆痕迹和场景构建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There has been a persistent debate about how to define episodic memory and whether it is a uniquely human capacity. On the one hand, many animal cognition studies employ content-based criteria, such as the what-where-when criterion, and argue that nonhuman animals possess episodic memory. On the other hand, many human cognition studies emphasize the subjective experience during retrieval as an essential property of episodic memory and the distinctly human foresight it purportedly enables. We propose that both perspectives may examine distinct but complementary aspects of episodic memory by drawing a conceptual distinction between episodic memory traces and mental time travel. Episodic memory traces are sequential mnemonic representations of particular, personally experienced episodes. Mental time travel draws on these traces, but requires other components to construct scenarios and embed them into larger narratives. Various nonhuman animals may store episodic memory traces, and yet it is possible that only humans are able to construct and reflect on narratives of their lives- and flexibly compare alternative scenarios of the remote future. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:关于如何定义情节记忆以及它是否具有独特的人类能力一直存在着持续的争论。一方面,许多动物认知研究都采用基于内容的标准,例如“何时何地”标准,并认为非人类动物具有情景记忆。另一方面,许多人类认知研究都强调检索过程中的主观经验是情节性记忆的本质属性,据称它具有明显的人类远见。我们提出,这两种观点都可以通过在情节记忆痕迹和心理时间旅行之间画出概念上的区别来检验情节记忆的不同但互补的方面。情节记忆痕迹是特定的,个人经历的情节的顺序助记符表示。精神上的时光旅行借鉴了这些痕迹,但需要其他组件来构造场景并将其嵌入更大的叙述中。各种各样的非人类动物可能会存储情节记忆的痕迹,但是有可能只有人类才能构造并反思其生活叙事,并且可以灵活地比较遥远未来的替代情景。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号