首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing
【24h】

Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing

机译:太糟糕了:社交焦虑中生气面孔的偏见会干扰身份处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recognition of faces across incidences is a complex function of the human brain and a crucial ability for communication and daily interactions. This first study on ERP correlates of emotional face learning in social anxiety disorder (SAD) investigates whether the known attentional bias for threatening faces leads to a corresponding memory bias. Therefore, 21 patients with SAD and 21 healthy controls (HCs) learned faces with emotional facial expressions (neutral, happy, and angry) and were later asked to recognize these out of novel identities all presented with a neutral facial expression. EEG was recorded throughout. Behaviorally, the faces' emotional expression modulated later recognition in terms of accuracy, response times, signal detection parameters and ratings of valence, but with better performance for happy than angry faces in HC as well as in SAD. In the learning phase, attention- and memory-associated event related potentials (ERPs) P100, N170, P200, N250/EPN, and LPP indicated enhanced processing of angry faces, which was restricted to patients with SAD in N250/EPN and LPP. In the test phase, familiarity effects emerged in N250, FN400 and LPP. While N250 was affected by learned-angry faces, FN400 and LPP reflected image learning of neutral faces, which was restricted to SAD in LPP. We replicated the attentional bias to threatening faces, which was not restricted to early ERP components, but was prolonged to later stages of conscious processing, especially in SAD. In contrast to what had been expected, sustained hypervigilance to the emotional content seems to have impaired the processing of the facial identity, resulting in a happy face advantage at the behavioral level. This could be explained by prominent models assuming separate processing of facial emotion and identity. Hypervigilance in SAD might be a disadvantage in those studies focusing on other aspects of face processing than emotion. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:识别各种事件中的面部表情是人脑的复杂功能,也是沟通和日常互动的关键能力。这项关于社交焦虑症(SAD)中的情绪面孔学习的ERP关系的第一项研究调查了已知的威胁面孔的注意偏见是否会导致相应的记忆偏见。因此,有21位SAD患者和21位健康对照(HCs)学会了带有情感表情(中性,快乐和生气)的面孔,后来被要求从所有具有中性表情的新颖身份中识别出这些表情。整个记录EEG。从行为上讲,面部表情在准确度,响应时间,信号检测参数和化合价等方面调节了后来的识别,但在HC和SAD中,幸福的表情比生气的表情要好。在学习阶段,注意力和记忆相关事件相关电位(ERP)P100,N170,P200,N250 / EPN和LPP表示生气表情的处理得到增强,这仅限于N250 / EPN和LPP中的SAD患者。在测试阶段,N250,FN400和LPP中出现了熟悉感。 N250受学习型面孔的影响,而FN400和LPP反映了中性面孔的图像学习,这仅限于LPP中的SAD。我们将注意偏见复制到威胁性面孔上,这不仅限于早期的ERP组件,而是延长至有意识的后期处理,尤其是在SAD中。与预期的相反,对情绪内容的持续过度警惕似乎削弱了面部识别的处理,从而在行为层面上产生了幸福的面孔优势。这可以通过突出模型来解释,这些模型假定分别处理面部情绪和身份。在那些侧重于面部处理而非情感的其他研究中,SAD的超警惕性可能是不利的。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号