首页> 外文期刊>Neuroreport >An exploratory study of using polygraph to detect deception in patients with traumatic brain injury
【24h】

An exploratory study of using polygraph to detect deception in patients with traumatic brain injury

机译:用测谎仪检测脑外伤患者欺骗行为的探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To investigate the accuracy of the polygraph when used on patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to analyze the factors influencing accuracy to enable provision of some field data for expert witnesses. Sixty patients with TBI (experimental group) and sixty normal individuals (control group) were tested by the polygraph with a Stimulation Test; responses of skin conductance, respiration, and finger pulse were recorded. The intelligence quotient of the experimental participants was measured and the factors influencing the accuracy of the polygraph test were analyzed. According to the computer automatic scoring, the overall accuracy was 76.7% for the control group; the accuracy of skin conductance, respiration, and finger pulse was 76.7, 35, and 18.7%, respectively, whereas for the experimental group, the overall accuracy was 56.7%. The accuracy of skin conductance, respiration, and finger pulse was 55.6, 23.3, and 25%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the overall accuracy between the two groups (P=0.020). According to the examiner's manual scoring, the overall accuracy was 86.7% for the control group and 61.7% for the experimental group (χ=9.786, P=0.002). The difference in accuracy obtained from the examiner and the computer was not significant. In the experimental group, the intelligence quotient of participants who had the right outcome was 63.2±10.9 and it was 55.3±9.5 for those who had the wrong outcome; this difference was significant (t=2.68, P=0.010).The accuracy of a polygraph test is much lower when it is used on patients with TBI compared with that of normal individuals. In actual application, full communication with the examinees should take place and their comprehension of the protocol should be evaluated. If participants can understand and co-operate with the test, the outcome can be considered reliable; if not, the outcome should not be relied on.
机译:调查用于颅脑外伤(TBI)患者的测谎仪的准确性,并分析影响准确性的因素,以便为专家证人提供一些现场数据。测谎仪采用刺激试验对60例TBI患者(实验组)和60例正常人(对照组)进行了检查;记录皮肤电导,呼吸和手指脉搏的反应。测量实验参与者的智商,并分析影响测谎仪准确性的因素。根据计算机自动评分,对照组的总体准确率为76.7%;皮肤电导,呼吸和手指脉搏的准确度分别为76.7、35和18.7%,而实验组的总体准确度为56.7%。皮肤电导,呼吸和手指搏动的准确度分别为55.6、23.3和25%。两组之间的总体准确性存在显着差异(P = 0.020)。根据检查员的人工评分,对照组的总体准确性为86.7%,实验组的总体准确性为61.7%(χ= 9.786,P = 0.002)。从检查员和计算机获得的准确性差异不明显。在实验组中,结果正确的受试者的智商为63.2±10.9,结果错误的受试者的智商为55.3±9.5。这种差异是显着的(t = 2.68,P = 0.010)。与正常人相比,用于TBI患者的测谎仪测试的准确性要低得多。在实际应用中,应与应试者进行充分的交流,并应评估他们对协议的理解。如果参与者可以理解并与测试合作,则结果可以认为是可靠的;如果不是,则不应该依赖结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号