首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Impact of tDCS on performance and learning of target detection: Interaction with stimulus characteristics and experimental design
【24h】

Impact of tDCS on performance and learning of target detection: Interaction with stimulus characteristics and experimental design

机译:tDCS对性能和目标检测学习的影响:与刺激特征和实验设计的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We have previously found that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over right inferior frontal cortex (RIFC) enhances performance during learning of a difficult visual target detection task (Clark et al., 2012). In order to examine the cognitive mechanisms of tDCS that lead to enhanced performance, here we analyzed its differential effects on responses to stimuli that varied by repetition and target presence, differences related to expectancy by comparing performance in single- and double-blind task designs, and individual differences in skin stimulation and mood. Participants were trained for 1. h to detect target objects hidden in a complex virtual environment, while anodal tDCS was applied over RIFC at 0.1. mA or 2.0. mA for the first 30. min. Participants were tested immediately before and after training and again 1. h later. Higher tDCS current was associated with increased performance for all test stimuli, but was greatest for repeated test stimuli with the presence of hidden-targets. This finding was replicated in a second set of subjects using a double-blind task design. Accuracy for target detection discrimination sensitivity (d'; Z(hits) -Z(false alarms)) was greater for 2.0. mA current (1.77) compared with 0.1. mA (0.95), with no differences in response bias (β). Taken together, these findings indicate that the enhancement of performance with tDCS is sensitive to stimulus repetition and target presence, but not to changes in expectancy, mood, or type of blinded task design. The implications of these findings for understanding the cognitive mechanisms of tDCS are discussed.
机译:我们先前已经发现,在右下额叶皮层(RIFC)上经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可提高学习困难的视觉目标检测任务的性能(Clark等,2012)。为了检验导致性能提高的tDCS的认知机制,在这里我们通过比较单盲和双盲任务设计中的性能来分析其对刺激响应的差异影响,该差异随重复和目标存在而变化,与预期相关。以及皮肤刺激和情绪的个体差异。对参与者进行了1小时的培训,以检测隐藏在复杂虚拟环境中的目标对象,而阳极tDCS以0.1的速度应用于RIFC。 mA或2.0。前30分钟为mA。在训练前后立即对参与者进行测试,并在1. h之后再次进行测试。更高的tDCS电流与所有测试刺激的性能提高相关,但对于存在隐藏目标的重复测试刺激最大。使用双盲任务设计将这一发现复制到第二组受试者中。目标检测辨别灵敏度(d'; Z(命中)-Z(错误警报))的精度为2.0。毫安电流(1.77)与0.1。 mA(0.95),响应偏差(β)无差异。综上,这些发现表明,tDCS的性能增强对重复刺激和目标存在很敏感,但对预期,情绪或盲目的任务设计类型却不敏感。讨论了这些发现对理解tDCS认知机制的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号