首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >When action is not enough: tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to Body Schema.
【24h】

When action is not enough: tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to Body Schema.

机译:当动作不够时:工具的使用会显示对主体模式的触觉依赖访问。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Proper motor control of our own body implies a reliable representation of body parts. This information is supposed to be stored in the Body Schema (BS), a body representation that appears separate from a more perceptual body representation, the Body Image (BI). The dissociation between BS for action and BI for perception, originally based on neuropsychological evidence, has recently become the focus of behavioural studies in physiological conditions. By inducing the rubber hand illusion in healthy participants, Kammers et al. (2009) showed perceptual changes attributable to the BI to which the BS, as indexed via motor tasks, was immune. To more definitively support the existence of dissociable body representations in physiological conditions, here we tested for the opposite dissociation, namely, whether a tool-use paradigm would induce a functional update of the BS (via a motor localization task) without affecting the BI (via a perceptual localization task). Healthy subjects were required to localize three anatomical landmarks on their right arm, before and after using the same arm to control a tool. In addition to this classical task-dependency approach, we assessed whether preferential access to the BS could also depend upon the way positional information about forearm targets is provided, to subsequently execute the same task. To this aim, participants performed either verbally or tactually driven versions of the motor and perceptual localization tasks. Results showed that both the motor and perceptual tasks were sensitive to the update of the forearm representation, but only when the localization task (perceptual or motor) was driven by a tactile input. This pattern reveals that the motor output is not sufficient per se, but has to be coupled with tactually mediated information to guarantee access to the BS. These findings shade a new light on the action-perception models of body representations and underlie how functional plasticity may be a useful tool to clarify their operational definition.
机译:对我们自己的身体进行正确的电动机控制意味着对身体部位的可靠表示。该信息应该存储在“身体模式”(BS)中,这是一种与更具感知力的身体表示“身体图像”(BI)分开显示的身体表示。最初基于神经心理学的证据,用于行动的BS和用于感知的BI之间的分离最近已成为生理条件下行为研究的重点。通过在健康参与者中诱发橡胶手的错觉,Kammers等人。 (2009年)显示出可归因于BI的知觉变化,通过运动任务将BS免疫到BI。为了更明确地支持生理条件下可分离的身体表示的存在,在这里我们测试了相反的分离,即,使用工具的范例是否会(通过运动定位任务)引起BS的功能更新而不影响BI(通过感知本地化任务)。健康受试者需要在使用同一只手臂控制工具之前和之后在其右臂上定位三个解剖学界标。除了这种经典的任务依赖方法之外,我们还评估了是否可以优先访问BS还取决于提供有关前臂目标的位置信息的方式,以随后执行相同的任务。为此目的,参与者执行了语言和触觉驱动的运动和感知定位任务的版本。结果表明,运动和知觉任务都对前臂表示的更新敏感,但仅当本地化任务(知觉或运动)由触觉输入驱动时才敏感。这种模式表明电机输出本身并不足够,但必须与触觉介导的信息相结合才能保证访问BS。这些发现为身体表征的动作知觉模型提供了新的亮点,并说明了功能可塑性如何成为阐明其操作定义的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号