首页> 外文期刊>Neuropharmacology >Defining 'epileptogenesis' and identifying ' antiepileptogenic targets' in animal models of acquired temporal lobe epilepsy is not as simple as it might seem
【24h】

Defining 'epileptogenesis' and identifying ' antiepileptogenic targets' in animal models of acquired temporal lobe epilepsy is not as simple as it might seem

机译:在获得性颞叶癫痫的动物模型中定义“癫痫发生”和识别“抗癫痫发生靶标”并不像看起来那么简单

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The "latent period" between brain injury and clinical epilepsy is widely regarded to be a seizure-free, pre-epileptic state during which a time-consuming cascade of molecular events and structural changes gradually mediates the process of "epileptogenesis." The concept of the "latent period" as the duration of "epileptogenesis" implies that epilepsy is not an immediate result of brain injury, and that anti-epileptogenic strategies need to target delayed secondary mechanisms that develop sometime after an initial injury. However, depth recordings made directly from the dentate granule cell layers in awake rats after convulsive status epilepticus-induced injury have now shown that whenever perforant pathway stimulation-induced status epilepticus produces extensive hilar neuron loss and entorhinal cortical injury, hyperexcitable granule cells immediately generate spontaneous epileptiform discharges and focal or generalized behavioral seizures. This indicates that hippocampal injury caused by convulsive status epilepticus is immediately epileptogenic and that hippocampal epileptogenesis requires no delayed secondary mechanism. When latent periods do exist after injury, we hypothesize that less extensive cell loss causes an extended period during which initially subclinical focal seizures gradually increase in duration to produce the first clinical seizure. Thus, the "latent period" is suggested to be a state of "epileptic maturation," rather than a prolonged period of "epileptogenesis," and therefore the antiepileptogenic therapeutic window may only remain open during the first week after injury, when some delayed cell death may still be preventable. Following the perhaps unavoidable development of the first focal seizures ("epileptogenesis"), the most fruitful therapeutic strategy may be to interrupt the process of "epileptic maturation," thereby keeping focal seizures focal. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'New Targets and Approaches to the Treatment of Epilepsy'.
机译:脑损伤与临床癫痫之间的“潜伏期”被广泛认为是一种无癫痫发作的癫痫前期状态,在此期间,耗时的分子事件和结构变化逐渐逐渐介导了“癫痫发生”的过程。 “潜伏期”的概念是“癫痫发生”的持续时间,这意味着癫痫不是脑损伤的直接结果,并且抗癫痫发生策略需要针对在初次损伤后某个时间发展的延迟性次级机制。然而,从惊厥性癫痫持续状态诱发的损伤后的清醒大鼠中,直接从齿状颗粒细胞层进行的深度记录表明,每当穿孔途径刺激引起的癫痫持续状态引起广泛的肺门神经元丢失和内嗅皮质损伤时,高兴奋性颗粒细胞会立即自发产生癫痫样放电和局灶性或全身性行为性癫痫发作。这表明由惊厥性癫痫持续状态引起的海马损伤是立即致癫痫的,而海马癫痫发生不需要延迟的次级机制。当损伤后确实存在潜伏期时,我们假设较少的广泛细胞损失会导致更长的时期,在此期间,最初的亚临床局灶性癫痫发作持续时间会逐渐增加,以产生首次临床癫痫发作。因此,“潜伏期”被认为是“癫痫成熟”的状态,而不是“癫痫发生”的延长期,因此,抗癫痫治疗窗口可能仅在受伤后的第一周内保持开放,此时一些延迟的细胞死亡仍然可以预防。在最初的局灶性癫痫发作(“癫痫发生”)可能不可避免的发展之后,最富有成效的治疗策略可能是中断“癫痫成熟”的过程,从而使局灶性癫痫发作保持局灶性。本文是名为“治疗癫痫的新目标和新方法”的特刊的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号