首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage >Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study.
【24h】

Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study.

机译:通过社交和符号提示的自动注意力定向可以激活不同的神经网络:一项功能磁共振成像研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Visual attention can be automatically re-oriented by another person's non-predictive gaze as well as by symbolic arrow cues. We investigated whether the shifts of attention triggered by biologically relevant gaze cues and biologically non-relevant arrow cues rely on the same neural systems by comparing the effects of gaze-cued and arrow-cued orienting on blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal in humans. Participants detected laterally presented reaction signals preceded by centrally presented non-predictive gaze and arrow cues. Directional gaze cues and arrow cues were presented in separate blocks. Furthermore, two separate control blocks were run in which non-directional cues (straight gaze or segment of a line) were used. The BOLD signals during the control blocks were subtracted from those during the respective blocks with directional cues. Behavioral data showed that, for both cue types, reaction times were shorter on congruent than incongruent trials. Imaging data revealed three foci of activation for gaze-cued orienting: in the left inferior occipital gyrus and right medial and inferior occipital gyri. For arrow-cued orienting, a much more extensive network was activated. There were large postcentral activations bilaterally including areas in the medial/inferior occipital gyri and medial temporal gyri and in the left intraparietal area. Interestingly, arrow cuing also activated the right frontal eye field and supplementary eye field. The results suggest that attention orienting by gaze cues and attention orienting by arrow cues are not supported by the same cortical network and that attention orienting by symbolic arrow cues relies on mechanisms associated with voluntary shifts of attention.
机译:他人的非预期注视以及符号箭头提示可以自动将视觉注意力重新定向。我们通过比较注视和箭头指示的定向对血液中氧合水平依赖性(BOLD)信号的影响,研究了生物学相关的凝视提示和生物学无关的箭头提示触发的注意力转移是否依赖于相同的神经系统。人类。参与者检测到横向呈现的反应信号,然后出现中央呈现的非预测性注视和箭头提示。方向注视提示和箭头提示在单独的块中显示。此外,运行了两个单独的控制块,其中使用了无方向提示(直视或直线段)。控制块中的BOLD信号通过方向提示从各个块中的BOLD信号中减去。行为数据表明,对于两种提示类型,全等试验的反应时间均比全等试验的反应时间短。成像数据显示了凝视提示定向的三个激活点:左下枕回和右下枕回。对于箭头提示的定向,激活了一个更广泛的网络。两侧有大的中央后激活,包括枕下内侧/颞下回和颞内侧回以及顶壁内区域。有趣的是,箭头提示还激活了右额眼视野和辅助眼视野。结果表明,同一个皮质网络不支持通过注视提示进行注意力定向和通过箭头提示进行注意力定向,并且通过符号箭头提示进行注意力定向依赖于与注意力的自愿转移相关的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号