...
首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage >Noninvasive identification of human central sulcus: a comparison of gyral morphology, functional MRI, dipole localization, and direct cortical mapping.
【24h】

Noninvasive identification of human central sulcus: a comparison of gyral morphology, functional MRI, dipole localization, and direct cortical mapping.

机译:非侵入性识别人中央沟:回旋形态,功能性MRI,偶极子定位和直接皮层标测的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The locations of the human primary hand cortical somatosensory and motor areas were estimated using structural and functional MRI, scalp-recorded somatosensory-evoked potential dipole localization, expert judgments based on cortical anatomy, and direct cortical stimulation and recording studies. The within-subject reliability of localization (across 3 separate days) was studied for eight normal subjects. Intraoperative validation was obtained from five neurosurgical patients. The mean discrepancy between the different noninvasive functional imaging methods ranged from 6 to 26 mm. Quantitative comparison of the noninvasive methods with direct intraoperative stimulation and recording studies did not reveal a significant mean difference in accuracy. However, the expert judgments of the location of the sensory hand areas were significantly more variable (maximum error, 39 mm) than the dipole or functional MRI techniques. It is concluded that because expert judgments are less reliable for identifying the cortical hand area, consideration of the findings of noninvasive functional MRI and dipole localization studies is desirable for preoperative surgical planning.
机译:使用结构和功能MRI,头皮记录的体感诱发电位偶极子定位,基于皮层解剖的专家判断以及直接的皮层刺激和记录研究,估算了人类主手皮层体感和运动区域的位置。研究了八个正常受试者的受试者内部定位可靠性(跨越3天)。术中验证是从五名神经外科患者获得的。不同的非侵入性功能成像方法之间的平均差异范围为6到26 mm。将无创方法与术中直接刺激和记录研究进行定量比较,未发现准确性的显着平均差异。但是,与偶极子或功能性MRI技术相比,专家对感觉手区域位置的判断要明显多变(最大误差为39 mm)。结论是,由于专家判断对于识别皮层手部区域的可靠性较差,因此考虑术前手术计划时需要考虑无创功能性MRI和偶极子定位研究的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号