首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage >Identifying robust and sensitive frequency bands for interrogating neural oscillations.
【24h】

Identifying robust and sensitive frequency bands for interrogating neural oscillations.

机译:识别用于询问神经振荡的健壮和敏感的频带。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent years have seen an explosion of interest in using neural oscillations to characterize the mechanisms supporting cognition and emotion. Oftentimes, oscillatory activity is indexed by mean power density in predefined frequency bands. Some investigators use broad bands originally defined by prominent surface features of the spectrum. Others rely on narrower bands originally defined by spectral factor analysis (SFA). Presently, the robustness and sensitivity of these competing band definitions remains unclear. Here, a Monte Carlo-based SFA strategy was used to decompose the tonic ("resting" or "spontaneous") electroencephalogram (EEG) into five bands: delta (1-5Hz), alpha-low (6-9Hz), alpha-high (10-11Hz), beta (12-19Hz), and gamma (>21Hz). This pattern was consistent across SFA methods, artifact correction/rejection procedures, scalp regions, and samples. Subsequent analyses revealed that SFA failed to deliver enhanced sensitivity; narrow alpha sub-bands proved no more sensitive than the classical broadband to individual differences in temperament or mean differences in task-induced activation. Other analyses suggested that residual ocular and muscular artifact was the dominant source of activity during quiescence in the delta and gamma bands. This was observed following threshold-based artifact rejection or independent component analysis (ICA)-based artifact correction, indicating that such procedures do not necessarily confer adequate protection. Collectively, these findings highlight the limitations of several commonly used EEG procedures and underscore the necessity of routinely performing exploratory data analyses, particularly data visualization, prior to hypothesis testing. They also suggest the potential benefits of using techniques other than SFA for interrogating high-dimensional EEG datasets in the frequency or time-frequency (event-related spectral perturbation, event-related synchronization/desynchronization) domains.
机译:近年来,人们越来越关注使用神经振荡来表征支持认知和情感的机制。通常,通过预定频段的平均功率密度来索引振荡活动。一些研究人员使用最初由光谱的突出表面特征定义的宽带。其他人则依靠最初由频谱因子分析(SFA)定义的较窄频带。目前,这些竞争频带定义的鲁棒性和敏感性仍不清楚。在这里,基于蒙特卡洛(Monte Carlo)的SFA策略被用于将补品(“静止”或“自发”)脑电图(EEG)分解为五个频带:δ(1-5Hz),α低(6-9Hz),α-高(10-11Hz),β(12-19Hz)和伽马(> 21Hz)。该模式在SFA方法,伪影校正/剔除程序,头皮区域和样品之间是一致的。随后的分析表明,SFA无法提供更高的敏感性。事实证明,窄的alpha子带对个体气质差异或任务诱导激活的均值差异不比传统宽带敏感。其他分析表明,在三角带和伽马带静止期间,残留的眼部和肌肉伪影是活动的主要来源。在基于阈值的伪像拒绝或基于独立成分分析(ICA)的伪像校正后观察到此情况,表明此类过程不一定提供足够的保护。总的来说,这些发现突出了几种常用的EEG程序的局限性,并强调了在假设检验之前例行进行探索性数据分析(尤其是数据可视化)的必要性。他们还建议使用SFA以外的技术来查询频域或时频域(事件相关的频谱扰动,事件相关的同步/去同步)中的高维EEG数据集的潜在好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号