Reporting Quality Assessment of systematic reviews on Quality of Life in Patients with Enterostomy in China

摘要

Aims: The study aimed to comprehensively search the systematic reviews and meta-analyses on quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with enterostomy in China and strictlyevaluate the reporting quality, to promote the clinical transformation and implementation of evidence-based evidence on quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with enterostomy. Method: Cnki, Wanfang and VIP databases were comprehensively searched from the database construction to September 15, 2021, to find the meta-analyses on quality of life incolorectal cancer patients with enterostomy in China. We used the PRISMA statement toevaluate their reporting quality rigorously. Results: 9 articles were included in this study. Their PRISMA scores ranged from 18 to 24, with an average score of 20.44. The reportingrate of PRISMA in 9 articles was 70.37 to 88.89. The 27 PRISMA items had a 0–100reporting rate. Conclusion: The reporting quality of meta-analyses on quality of life incolorectal cancer patients with enterostomy in China is ideal. However, there are still 8PRISMA items with a reporting rate of less than 70, which need to be further improved infuture research.