首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition
【24h】

Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition

机译:半干旱气候条件下不同时间序列模型应用于月降水量预报的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002-2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989-2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查不同时间序列模型在预测月降雨量方面的能力。为此,从1989年至2012年从北呼罗珊省(伊朗东北部)的9个雨量站收集了月降雨量数据。使用R软件预测了2002年这9个雨量计站的最高降雨量-2012使用1989-2002年每月最高降雨量数据。在这项研究中,基于反复试验,研究了具有11种不同结构的AR,MA,ARMA,ARIMA和SARIMA。由于趋势,季节和跃变成分是确定性成分,因此不必对这些成分进行建模,但是随机成分的建模对于降雨预测非常重要。因此,分解了主要数据系列(针对AR,MA和ARMA模型),并对随机部分进行了建模。此后,收集随机分量以及季节和趋势分量,并模拟降雨量。但对于ARIMA和SARIMA,模型适用于原始系列。结果表明,在33%的数据MA(2)中,22%的数据AR(1)和ARMA(2,1)以及11.11%的数据MA(1)和ARIMA(1、2、1)具有在每月降雨量预报中表现最佳。另一方面,通过数据更改的最佳时间序列模型可能会有所不同。因此,重要的是评估任何区域和任何水文参数的所有时间序列模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号