首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >The consequences of security cognition in post-disaster urban planning practices in the case of Turkey
【24h】

The consequences of security cognition in post-disaster urban planning practices in the case of Turkey

机译:就土耳其而言,安全认知在灾后城市规划实践中的后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper synthesis the literature on risk and disaster paradigms and evaluates the disaster management system of Turkey by presenting the post-disaster urban planning practices. The threat of nature on human being and their artefacts establishes risk cognition and becomes one of the main concerns of societies due to the social and economic costs. The change in the perception of risk has led to revise the disaster management paradigms at international level in 1990s. The traditional disaster paradigms see the physical world as an externality causing damage on human environment, thus the aim of this thought is to reduce losses caused by disasters. Seeing the shortcomings of traditional approaches, the changing conceptualization of disasters concludes to contemporary approaches, which assume that pre-disaster policies lead to rationalization of resource allocation and increase efficiency of investments made to reduce risks. However, a disaster management system dominated by traditional view, which focuses on direct impacts of disasters and ignores the secondary effects, leads to employment of resources in an irregular way without predicting possible consequences. In the disaster management approach of Turkey, the security concern of the traditional approach produces permanent housing in geologically safer districts, which causes the problem of fragmentation of urban space. Adapazari and Van, earthquake-hit cities of Turkey, exemplify the post-disaster urban setting of a traditional disaster management approach. Along with the literature, post-disaster practices of Turkey reveal that the security concern result in generation of new settlement districts posing new problems such as fragmentation of urban bodies, alienation of new settlements from historicity of existing town and isolation of urban public culture.
机译:本文综合了有关风险和灾难范式的文献,并通过介绍灾后城市规划实践来评估土耳其的灾难管理系统。自然对人类及其制品的威胁建立了风险认知,并由于社会和经济成本而成为社会的主要关注之一。风险观念的改变导致1990年代国际一级的灾害管理范例发生了变化。传统的灾难范式将物理世界视为对人类环境造成破坏的外部性,因此该思想的目的是减少灾难造成的损失。鉴于传统方法的不足,不断变化的灾难概念化发展为当代方法,该方法假定灾难前的政策可以使资源分配合理化,并提高降低风险的投资效率。但是,以传统观点为主导的灾害管理系统侧重于灾害的直接影响,却忽略了其次要影响,导致资源的使用不规则,无法预测可能的后果。在土耳其的灾难管理方法中,传统方法的安全性考虑因素在地质上较为安全的地区提供了永久性住房,这带来了城市空间碎片化的问题。土耳其遭受地震袭击的城市Adapazari和Van体现了传统灾难管理方法在灾后城市环境中的地位。连同文献,土耳其的灾后实践表明,出于安全考虑,新的定居区产生了新问题,例如城市主体的碎片化,新定居点与现有城镇的历史性分离以及城市公共文化的孤立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号