首页> 外文期刊>Neurological sciences >Tolerability and efficacy of erythropoietin (EPO) treatment in traumatic spinal cord injury: a preliminary randomized comparative trial vs. methylprednisolone (MP)
【24h】

Tolerability and efficacy of erythropoietin (EPO) treatment in traumatic spinal cord injury: a preliminary randomized comparative trial vs. methylprednisolone (MP)

机译:促红细胞生成素(EPO)在脊髓损伤中的耐受性和疗效:一项与甲基强的松龙(MP)的初步随机比较试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The only available treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is high-dose methylprednisolone (MP) administered acutely after injury. However, as the efficacy of MP is controversial, we assessed the superiority of erythropoietin (EPO) versus MP in improving clinical outcome of acute TSCI. Patients aged 18 to 65 years after C5-T12 injury, and grade A or B of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), admitted within 8 h, hemodynamically stable, were randomized to MP according to the NASCIS III protocol or EPO iv (500 UI/kg, repeated at 24 and 48 h). Patients were assessed by an investigator blind to treatment assignment at baseline and at day 3, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90. Primary end point: number of responders (reduction of at least one AIS grade). Secondary end points: treatment safety and the effects of drugs on a number of disability measures. Frequentistic and post hoc Bayesian analyses were performed. Eight patients were randomized to MP and 11 to EPO. Three patients (27.3 %) on EPO and no patients on MP reached the primary end point (p = 0.17). No significant differences were found for the other disability measures. No adverse events or serious adverse events were reported in both groups. The Bayesian analysis detected a 91.8 % chance of achieving higher success rates on the primary end point with EPO in the intention-to-treat population with a 95 % chance the difference between EPO and MP falling in the range (-0.10, 0.51) and a median value of 0.2. The results of Bayesian analysis favored the experimental treatment.
机译:创伤性脊髓损伤(TSCI)的唯一可用治疗方法是在损伤后急性给予大剂量甲基强的松龙(MP)。然而,由于MP的疗效尚存争议,我们评估了促红细胞生成素(EPO)与MP在改善急性TSCI临床结局方面的优势。根据NASCIS III方案或EPO iv(500 UI),在C5-T12损伤后18至65岁,ASIA损伤量表(AIS)的A级或B级,在8小时内入院,血流动力学稳定的患者被随机分配为MP / kg,在24和48 h重复一次。在基线,第3、7、14、30、60和90天,由不愿接受治疗分配的研究人员对患者进行评估。主要终点:缓解人数(减少至少一个AIS评分)。次要终点:治疗安全性和药物对多种残疾措施的影响。进行了频繁和事后贝叶斯分析。 8例患者随机分为MP组和11例EPO组。 EPO的3例患者(27.3%),MP的患者均未达到主要终点(p = 0.17)。其他残疾措施没有发现显着差异。两组均未报告不良事件或严重不良事件。贝叶斯分析发现,在意向性治疗人群中,EPO在主要终点获得更高成功率的可能性为91.8%,EPO与MP的差值落在范围(-0.10,0.51)和95%的范围内。中位数为0.2。贝叶斯分析的结果有利于实验处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号