...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society >The phylogenetic position of toadfishes (order Batrachoidiformes) in the higher ray-finned fish as inferred from partitioned Bayesian analysis of 102 whole mitochondrial genome sequences
【24h】

The phylogenetic position of toadfishes (order Batrachoidiformes) in the higher ray-finned fish as inferred from partitioned Bayesian analysis of 102 whole mitochondrial genome sequences

机译:根据对102条完整线粒体基因组序列的分区贝叶斯分析得出的结论,蟾蜍鱼(Ba形目鱼类)在较高射线鳍鱼中的系统发育位置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a previous study based on 100 whole mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) sequences, we sought to provide a new perspective on the ordinal relationships of higher ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii). The study left unexplored the phylogenetic position of toadfishes (order Batrachoidiformes), as data were unavailable owing to technical difficulties. In the present study, we successfully determined mitogenomic sequences for two toadfish species (Batrachomoeus trispinosus and Porichthys myriaster) and found that the difficulties resulted from unusual gene arrangements and associated repetitive non-coding sequences. Unambiguously aligned, concatenated mitogenomic sequences (13 461 bp) from 102 higher actinopterygians (excluding the ND6 gene and control region) were divided into five partitions (1st, 2nd and 3rd codon positions of the protein-coding genes, tRNA genes and rRNA genes) and partitioned Bayesian analyses were conducted. The resultant phylogenies strongly suggest that the toadfishes are not members of relatively primitive higher actinopterygians (Paracanthopterygii), but belong to a crown group of actinopterygians (Percomorpha), as was demonstrated for ophidiiform eels (Ophidiiformes) and anglerfishes (Lophiiformes) in the previous study. We propose revised limits of major unranked categories for higher actinopterygians and a new name (Berycomorpha) for a clade comprising two reciprocally paraphyletic orders (Beryciformes and Stephanoberyciformes) based on the present mitogenomic phylogenies. (c) 2005 The Linnean Society of London.
机译:在先前的基于100条完整线粒体基因组(有丝分裂基因组)序列的研究中,我们试图提供有关高鳍鱼(Actinopterygii)的序数关系的新观点。由于技术上的困难而无法获得数据,因此该研究还没有探索蟾蜍的系统发育位置(Batrachoidiformes)。在本研究中,我们成功地确定了两种蟾蜍(Batrachomoeus trispinosus和Porichthys myriaster)的线粒体基因组序列,并发现困难是由异常的基因排列和相关的重复非编码序列引起的。将来自102个高放线翅目鸟(不包括ND6基因和控制区)的明确对齐,串联的线粒体基因组序列(13461 bp)分为五个分区(蛋白质编码基因,tRNA基因和rRNA基因的第一,第二和第三密码子位置)并进行了分区贝叶斯分析。由此产生的系统进化论强烈表明,ad鱼不是相对原始的高放线翅目(Paracanthopterygii)的成员,而是属于放线翅目(Percomorpha)的冠群,如先前研究中的形鳗(Ophidiiformes)和angle鱼(Lophiiformes)所示。 。我们根据当前的线粒体系统发育史,提出了针对高放线翅目昆虫的主要未排序类别的修订限制,以及针对包含两个相互副生的阶(伯生科和步生古目科)的进化枝的新名称(贝母科)。 (c)2005年伦敦林奈学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号