...
【24h】

Authors' reply

机译:作者的回信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We appreciate the points raised in this letter and would like to clarify regarding the two main issues raised in the letter.Firstly, we do accept that given the retrospective nature of our study; many patients included had been seen several years back, and the new AASM guidelines were not strictly adhered to during polysomnography recordings. Since uniform data for periodic limb movements (PLMs) could not be obtained for all patients, we did refrain from pooling this data and reporting it. We do acknowledge that details about the PLMs and the PLM with arousal index could have added much more value to the paper.
机译:我们感谢本信中提出的观点,并希望就信中提出的两个主要问题进行澄清。首先,鉴于我们研究的回顾性,我们确实同意这一点。几年前就已经看到许多患者,并且多导睡眠图记录期间未严格遵守新的AASM指南。由于无法获得所有患者的周期性肢体运动(PLM)的统一数据,因此我们避免合并这些数据并进行报告。我们确实承认,有关PLM和带有唤醒指数的PLM的详细信息可能会为本文增加更多的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号