...
首页> 外文期刊>Metal Forming >Manual Bolting vs. Hydraulic Clamping-
【24h】

Manual Bolting vs. Hydraulic Clamping-

机译:手动螺栓与液压夹紧-

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Press Uptime is the Key Measurable ...but never ignore the common practices offered here to ensure a failsafe design that provides safe die retention regardless of operating conditions. Metalformers should understand that hydraulic clamps are not required for quick die change (QDC). They should, however, consider automatic clamps whenever die-change times exceed 20 min., or when manual bolting fails to achieve sufficient press uptime. Further, variations in manual bolting torque may not attain safe and consistent die-retention forces. Torque variation can cause process variability in some operations. Of course, when manual bolting cannot be accomplished safely and consistently, power clamping offers a good alternative.
机译:印刷机正常运行时间是可衡量的关键...但是,切勿忽略此处提供的通用做法,以确保进行故障安全设计,无论工作条件如何,都能提供安全的模具固位。金属成型者应了解,快速换模(QDC)不需要液压夹具。但是,只要换模时间超过20分钟,或者手动螺栓连接无法实现足够的压力机正常运行时间,他们就应该考虑使用自动夹具。此外,手动螺栓扭矩的变化可能无法获得安全一致的模具固位力。扭矩变化会导致某些操作中的过程变化。当然,当无法安全,稳定地完成手动螺栓连接时,电动夹紧是一个不错的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号