Compatibility of aphid resistance in soybean and biological control by the parasitoid Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).

摘要

Biological control and soybean cultivars bred for increased resistance to the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) are two approaches used to manage this serious pest of soybeans in North America. However, as with many other pest systems, the compatibility of these two pest management approaches has not been studied in detail. The aphidiine wasp Aphidius colemani is one of several candidate species for biological control of the soybean aphid in soybean in North America. Resistance to the soybean aphid in the USDA soybean cultivar Dowling is largely controlled by a single dominant gene Rag1, which is the focus of plant breeding programs directed against the soybean aphid. In this study, we measured developmental and behavioral differences in the parasitic wasp A. colemani when it attacked soybean aphids feeding on either the aphid-resistant Dowling or aphid-susceptible Glenwood cultivars of soybean. We used a combination of choice and no-choice experiments to examine the effects of host plant cultivar on the number of parasitized aphids formed and the sex ratio and body weights of adult offspring produced. Significantly more aphids were parasitized when they fed on Glenwood compared to Dowling and these offspring were larger when they developed in aphids that fed on Glenwood soybeans. To distinguish between effects on foraging decisions and offspring survivorship, we conducted an additional experiment that followed the oviposition decisions and fate of each parasitized aphid. Foraging female A. colemani spent less time handling individual aphids and encountered and attacked aphids at a higher rate when they fed on aphids feeding on Glenwood soybeans than aphids feeding on Dowling soybeans. Furthermore, wasp survivorship in aphids was greater on Glenwood than Dowling. Taken together, aphid-resistance in soybeans has negative effects on foraging behavior and offspring fitness of A. colemani raising concerns about the compatibility of these two pest management approaches.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.12.001