首页> 外文期刊>Biological Control: Theory and Application in Pest Management >Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems.
【24h】

Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems.

机译:用于保护自然生态系统的经典生物控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Of the 70 cases of classical biological control for the protection of nature found in our review, there were fewer projects against insect targets (21) than against invasive plants (49), in part, because many insect biological control projects were carried out against agricultural pests, while nearly all projects against plants targeted invasive plants in natural ecosystems. Of 21 insect projects, 81% (17) provided benefits to protection of biodiversity, while 48% (10) protected products harvested from natural systems, and 5% (1) preserved ecosystem services, with many projects contributing to more than one goal. In contrast, of the 49 projects against invasive plants, 98% (48) provided benefits to protection of biodiversity, while 47% (23) protected products, and 25% (12) preserved ecosystem services, again with many projects contributing to several goals. We classified projects into complete control (pest generally no longer important), partial control (control in some areas but not others), and "in progress," for projects in development for which outcomes do not yet exist. For insects, of the 21 projects discussed, 62% (13) achieved complete control of the target pest, 19% (4) provided partial control, and 43% (9) are still in progress. By comparison, of the 49 invasive plant projects considered, 27% (13) achieved complete control, while 33% (16) provided partial control, and 49% (24) are still in progress. For both categories of pests, some projects' success ratings were scored twice when results varied by region. We found approximately twice as many projects directed against invasive plants than insects and that protection of biodiversity was the most frequent benefit of both insect and plant projects. Ecosystem service protection was provided in the fewest cases by either insect or plant biological control agents, but was more likely to be provided by projects directed against invasive plants, likely because of the strong effects plants exert on landscapes. Rates of complete success appeared to be higher for insect than plant targets (62% vs 27%), perhaps because most often herbivores gradually weaken, rather than outright kill, their hosts, which is not the case for natural enemies directed against pest insects. For both insect and plant biological control, nearly half of all projects reviewed were listed as currently in progress, suggesting that the use of biological control for the protection of wildlands is currently very active.
机译:在我们的综述中找到了70个经典的自然保护生物控制案例,其中针对昆虫目标的项目(21个)比针对入侵植物的项目(49个)少,部分原因是因为许多针对农业的昆虫生物控制项目害虫,而几乎所有针对植物的项目都针对自然生态系统中的入侵植物。在21个昆虫项目中,有81%(17)为保护生物多样性提供了好处,而48%(10)保护的是从自然系统收获的产品,还有5%(1)保护的生态系统服务,其中许多项目为实现一个以上目标做出了贡献。相比之下,在49个针对入侵植物的项目中,有98%(48)为保护生物多样性提供了好处,而47%(23)受保护的产品和25%(12)保护的生态系统服务,同样,许多项目为实现多个目标做出了贡献。对于尚不具备成果的开发中项目,我们将项目分为完全控制(通常不再重要的害虫),部分控制(某些区域而不是其他区域的控制)和“进行中”。对于昆虫,在所讨论的21个项目中,有62%(13)实现了对目标害虫的完全控制,有19%(4)提供了部分控制,而43%(9)仍在进行中。相比之下,在考虑的49个入侵植物项目中,有27%(13)实现了完全控制,而33%(16)提供了部分控制,而49%(24)仍在进行中。对于这两种害虫,当结果因地区而异时,某些项目的成功等级获得了两次评分。我们发现,针对入侵植物的项目数量大约是昆虫的两倍,而保护生物多样性是昆虫和植物项目最常见的收益。昆虫或植物生物防治剂在最少的情况下提供了生态系统服务保护,但针对入侵植物的项目更可能提供生态系统服务保护,这可能是由于植物对景观产生的强烈影响。昆虫的完全成功率似乎比植物目标高(62%比27%),这也许是因为通常食草动物逐渐减弱而不是彻底杀死其寄主,而针对害虫的天敌却并非如此。对于昆虫和植物的生物防治,已审查的所有项目中有近一半被列为目前正在进行中,这表明目前非常活跃地利用生物防治来保护野生土地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号