首页> 外文期刊>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association >Considering health insurance: how do dialysis initiates with Medicaid coverage differ from persons without Medicaid coverage?
【24h】

Considering health insurance: how do dialysis initiates with Medicaid coverage differ from persons without Medicaid coverage?

机译:考虑健康保险:以Medicaid承保范围的透析发起者与没有Medicaid承保范围的透析者有何区别?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Type of health insurance is an important mediator of medical outcomes in the United States. Medicaid, a jointly sponsored Federal/State programme, is designed to serve medically needy individuals. How these patients differ from non-Medicaid-enrolled incident dialysis patients and how these differences have changed over time have not been systematically examined. METHODS: Using data from the United States Renal Data System, we identified individuals initiating dialysis from 1995 to 2004 and categorized their health insurance status. Longitudinal trends in demographic, risk behaviour, functional, comorbidity, laboratory and dialysis modality factors, as reported on the Medical Evidence Form (CMS-2728), were examined in all insurance groups. Polychotomous logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted generalized ratios (AGRs) for these factors by insurance status, with Medicaid as the referent insurance group. RESULTS: Overall, males constitute a growing percentage of both Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients, but in contrast to other insurance groups, Medicaid has a higher proportion of females. Non-Caucasians also constitute a higher proportion of Medicaid patients than non-Medicaid patients. Body mass index increased in all groups over time, and all groups witnessed a significant decrease in initiation on peritoneal dialysis. Polychotomous regression showed generally lower AGRs for minorities, risk behaviours and functional status, and higher AGRs for males, employment and self-care dialysis, for non-Medicaid insurance relative to Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: While many broad parallel trends are evident in both Medicaid and non-Medicaid incident dialysis patients, many important differences between these groups exist. These findings could have important implications for policy planners, providers and payers.
机译:背景:健康保险的类型是美国医疗结果的重要中介。 Medicaid是联邦/州联合发起的计划,旨在为有医疗需求的个人提供服务。这些患者与未登记医疗事故的透析患者有何不同,以及这些差异如何随时间变化尚未得到系统的研究。方法:使用来自美国肾脏数据系统的数据,我们鉴定了1995年至2004年开始进行透析的个人,并对他们的健康保险状况进行了分类。在所有保险组中,均检查了医学证明表(CMS-2728)上所报告的人口统计学,风险行为,功能,合并症,实验室和透析方式因素的纵向趋势。采用多分类逻辑回归,根据保险状况估算这些因素的调整后的广义比率(AGR),以医疗补助为参照保险组。结果:总体而言,男性在医疗补助和非医疗补助患者中所占的百分比都在增加,但是与其他保险组相比,医疗补助在女性中的比例更高。非高加索人在医疗补助患者中所占的比例也高于非医疗补助患者。随着时间的推移,所有组的体重指数均增加,并且所有组的腹膜透析开始时间均明显减少。多分类回归显示,与非医疗补助相比,少数民族,风险行为和功能状况的AGR普遍较低,而男性,就业和自我护理透析的男性的AGR较高。结论:尽管在医疗补助和非医疗补助事件透析患者中​​都有许多广泛的平行趋势,但这些人群之间存在许多重要差异。这些发现可能对政策制定者,提供者和付款者具有重要的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号