首页> 外文期刊>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association >Use of the femoral artery route for placement of temporary catheters for emergency haemodialysis when all usual central venous access sites are exhausted.
【24h】

Use of the femoral artery route for placement of temporary catheters for emergency haemodialysis when all usual central venous access sites are exhausted.

机译:当所有常见的中央静脉通路部位都已耗尽时,使用股动脉途径放置临时导管进行紧急血液透析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Urgent dialysis via a temporary central line may be impossible when all central veins are obstructed. METHODS: We report 10 patients (7 males and 3 females) over a 5-year period who lost all venous access sites, due to multiple peripheral venous thromboses with a superior vena cava obstruction or stenosis in 50%. These patients required urgent haemodialysis prior to general anaesthetic for a surgical intervention, but in all cases a traditional central venous line could not be used. They were therefore dialysed via a femoral artery catheter (FAC) before surgical rescue or creation of a more definite vascular access (VA). The median age of these patients was 64.7 years. None were suitable for peritoneal dialysis or urgent transplantation. Thirteen FACs (11F dual lumen dialysis catheter) were inserted into the common femoral artery. Both lumens were perfused continuously with heparinized saline (12 000 IU/24 h). All patients underwent a surgical procedure (rescue of previous access/creation of a new exotic one). First dialysis adequacy was assessed and compared to the rescued or new access. RESULTS: All patients had been on haemodialysis for a median period of 4.4 years. The mean number of previous access procedures was 17 (range 10-28). The duration of FAC use ranged from 1 to 12 days (mean 5 days). Dialysis adequacy was satisfactory for all patients. Seven patients had a complex vascular access formed and six had thrombectomy of their previous access. There were two complications related to FAC use, which were distal ischaemia and bleeding. Three patients died from access-related problems at 0, 4.6 and 15.0 months. Seven are still dialysed through their fistula or graft as outpatients with a mean follow-up of 14.0 months (range 0-50.9 months). CONCLUSION: Femoral artery dialysis is an effective means of haemodialysis as a method to bridge the gap before definitive vascular access formation when all other options have been exhausted.
机译:背景:当所有中心静脉均受阻时,通过临时中心线进行紧急透析可能是不可能的。方法:我们报告在5年期间有10例患者(7例男性和3例女性)由于所有周围静脉血栓形成伴上腔静脉阻塞或狭窄(占50%)而失去所有静脉通路。这些患者在进行全身麻醉之前需要进行紧急血液透析以进行外科手术,但是在所有情况下都无法使用传统的中心静脉导管。因此,在进行外科手术抢救或建立更明确的血管通路(VA)之前,需通过股动脉导管(FAC)对其进行透析。这些患者的中位年龄为64.7岁。没有一种适合腹膜透析或紧急移植。将十三根FAC(11F双腔透析导管)插入股总动脉中。两个腔均用肝素化盐水连续灌注(12000 IU / 24 h)。所有患者均接受了外科手术(先前进入/创建了一个新的异国患者)。评估初次透析的充分性,并将其与抢救或新获得的通路进行比较。结果:所有患者均接受了血液透析,中位时间为4.4年。先前访问过程的平均数量为17(范围为10-28)。使用FAC的持续时间为1到12天(平均5天)。所有患者的透析充分性均令人满意。 7例患者形成了复杂的血管通路,其中6例对其先前的通路进行了血栓切除术。与FAC使用相关的并发症有两个,分别是远端缺血和出血。 3名患者在0、4.6和15.0个月时死于与访问相关的问题。 7例仍作为门诊病人通过瘘管或移植物进行透析,平均随访14.0个月(0-50.9个月)。结论股动脉透析是一种有效的血液透析方法,可在其他所有方法都用尽后在确定的血管通路形成之前弥合间隙。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号