首页> 外文期刊>Biological invasions >Phragmites australis: How do genotypes of different phylogeographic origins differ from their invasive genotypes in growth, nitrogen allocation and gas exchange?
【24h】

Phragmites australis: How do genotypes of different phylogeographic origins differ from their invasive genotypes in growth, nitrogen allocation and gas exchange?

机译:芦苇:不同植物学起源的基因型在生长,氮分配和气体交换方面与入侵基因型有何不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It has been suggested that in plant invasions, species may develop intrinsically higher gas exchange and growth rates, and greater nitrogen uptake and allocation to shoots, in their invasive range than in their native habitat under excess nutrients. In this study, native populations of two old world Phragmites australis phylogeographic groups (EU and MED) were compared with their invasive populations in North America [NAint (M) and NAint (Delta)] under unlimited nutrient availability and identical environmental conditions in a common garden. We expected that both introduced groups would have higher growth, nitrogen uptake and allocation, and gas exchange rates than their native groups, but that these enhanced traits would have evolved in different ways in the two introduced ranges, because of different evolutionary histories. Biomass, leaf area, leaf nitrogen concentrations (NH4 (+) and NO3 (-)) and transpiration rates increased in introduced versus native groups, whereas differences in SLA, leaf pigment concentrations and assimilation rates were due to phylogeographic origins. Despite intrinsic differences in the allocation of C and N in leaves, shoots and rhizome due to phylogeographic origin, the introduced groups invested more biomass in above-ground tissues than roots and rhizomes. Our results support the concept that invasive populations develop enhanced morphological, physiological and biomass traits in their new ranges that may assist their competiveness under nutrient-enriched conditions, however the ecophysiological processes leading to these changes can be different and depend on the evolutionary history of the genotypes.
机译:有人提出,在植物入侵中,物种在入侵范围内比在过量养分下的原生生境中会发展出更高的气体交换和生长速率,以及更高的氮素吸收和向芽的分配。在这项研究中,比较了两个旧世界芦苇植物地理学群体(欧盟和地中海)的原住民种群与北美在有限的养分供应和相同环境条件下的入侵种群[NAint(M)和NAint(Delta)]花园。我们预计这两个引入的群体将比其原生群体具有更高的生长,氮素吸收和分配以及气体交换率,但是由于两个不同的进化历史,这些增强的性状在两个引入的范围内将以不同的方式进化。引入组和原生组相比,生物量,叶面积,叶氮浓度(NH4(+)和NO3​​(-))和蒸腾速率增加,而SLA,叶色素浓度和同化率的差异是由于植物学起源。尽管由于植物地理学的原因,叶,茎和根茎中碳和氮的分配存在内在差异,但引入的群体在地上组织中的生物量要比根和根茎多。我们的结果支持这样一个概念,即入侵种群在其新范围内发展出增强的形态,生理和生物量特征,这可能有助于它们在营养丰富的条件下的竞争能力,但是导致这些变化的生态生理过程可能有所不同,并且取决于种群的进化历史。基因型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号