...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Control: Theory and Application in Pest Management >Evaluating plant volatiles for monitoring natural enemies in apple, pear and walnut orchards
【24h】

Evaluating plant volatiles for monitoring natural enemies in apple, pear and walnut orchards

机译:评估植物挥发物以监测苹果,梨和核桃园中的天敌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The ability to estimate natural enemy abundance is crucial to the integration of biological control into IPM programs. Traditional sampling approaches for natural enemies are few and most are inefficient, but recent studies suggest attraction of natural enemies to plant volatiles may be a useful proxy for direct sampling. We evaluated various combinations of herbivore-induced plant volatiles and floral volatiles as monitoring tools for natural enemies found in apple, pear, and walnut orchards in California, Oregon, and Washington. In 2010 we used a full factorial experimental designs to evaluate lures for all combinations of acetic acid (AA), acetophenone (AP), phenylacetaldehyde (PAA) and 2-phenylethanol (PE). Of nine natural enemy taxa analyzed, we found syrphid flies responded strongly to PE, but combining AA with PE attenuated trap catch and combining PAA to PE eliminated the activity of PE. Chlysoperla spp. (Chrysopidae) responded strongly to most of the individual compounds and the various interactions between the components allowed multiple ways to achieve roughly the same trap catch. All of the hymenopteran taxa collected responded strongly to PAA, and PAA containing lures were nearly always a component of the top eight lures. A smaller factorial experiment testing all possible combinations of AA, PAA and methyl salicylate (MS) showed that single component AA or MS lures were generally not significantly different than the controls for all taxa tested, but for the hymenopteran taxa, traps baited with MS+PAA performed the best or were not significantly different than the best performing lure. A 2011 trial was conducted to test the influence of the addition of AA and/or MS on previously tested lures. Combining AA or MS with other lures, improved the capture of Chrysoperla spp.; Scaeva pyrastri (L.) (Syrphidae) capture was enhanced when MS was used with PE; and PE was attractive to the three syrphid flies, anysoperla spp., and the parasitoid Aphelinus mall (Haldeman) (Aphelinidae). The differential responses to various blends exhibited among taxa show that combinations of plant volatiles can be chosen to increase specificity of attraction to a few taxa or increase the number of species attracted. This flexibility should add to the general value and breadth of use of plant volatile monitoring lures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:估计天敌数量的能力对于将生物控制整合到IPM计划中至关重要。传统的天敌取样方法很少,大多数效率低下,但是最近的研究表明,天敌对植物挥发物的吸引可能是直接取样的有用代表。我们评估了食草动物诱发的植物挥发物和花卉挥发物的各种组合,作为监测在加利福尼亚,俄勒冈和华盛顿州苹果,梨和核桃园中发现的天敌的工具。在2010年,我们使用了完整的因子实验设计来评估乙酸(AA),苯乙酮(AP),苯乙醛(PAA)和2-苯乙醇(PE)的所有组合的诱饵。在分析的九种天敌类群中,我们发现found蝇对PE的反应强烈,但是将AA与PE结合使用可减少陷阱捕获,而将PAA与PE结合则消除了PE的活性。百里香属(金蝇科)对大多数单独的化合物反应强烈,并且各组分之间的各种相互作用允许以多种方式获得大致相同的捕集阱。收集的所有膜翅类类群对PAA都有强烈的反应,而包含PAA的诱饵几乎总是前八种诱饵的组成部分。较小的析因实验测试了所有可能的AA,PAA和水杨酸甲酯(MS)组合,结果表明,对于所有测试的类群,单组分AA或MS诱饵通常与对照没有显着差异,但对于膜翅类类群,诱集了MS + PAA表现最好或与表现最好的诱饵没有显着差异。 2011年进行了一项试验,以测试添加AA和/或MS对先前测试的诱饵的影响。将AA或MS与其他诱剂结合使用,可改善金眼藻的捕获。当MS与PE一起使用时,Scaeva pyrastri(L.)(Syrphidae)的捕获得到增强。 PE对三只蓝蝇蝇,anysoperla spp。和寄生蜂Aphelinus商场(Haldeman)(Aphelinidae)很有吸引力。对分类单元中表现出的各种混合物的不同反应表明,可以选择植物挥发物的组合来增加对几种分类单元的吸引特异性或增加被吸引物种的数量。这种灵活性应增加使用植物挥发性监测诱剂的一般价值和广度。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号