...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance trial N08CA - The use of glutathione for prevention of paclitaxel/carboplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
【24h】

North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance trial N08CA - The use of glutathione for prevention of paclitaxel/carboplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

机译:北部中部癌症治疗组/联合试验N08CA-谷胱甘肽在预防紫杉醇/卡铂引起的周围神经病变中的应用:一项3期随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant side effect of taxane and platinum-based chemotherapy. Several studies have supported the potential benefit of glutathione for the prevention of platinum-induced CIPN. The current trial was designed to determine whether glutathione would prevent CIPN as a result of carboplatin/paclitaxel therapy. METHODS In total, 185 patients who received treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin were accrued between December 4, 2009 and December 19, 2011. Patients were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 91) or 1.5 g/m 2 glutathione (n = 94) over 15 minutes immediately before chemotherapy. CIPN was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life (EORTC-QLQ) 20-item, CIPN-specific (CIPN20) sensory subscale and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 study arms with regard to: 1) peripheral neurotoxicity, as assessed using both the EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20 (P = .21) and the CTCAE scales (P = .449 for grade ≥2 neurotoxicity; P = .039 for time to development of grade ≥2 neuropathy, in favor of the placebo); 2) the degree of paclitaxel acute pain syndrome (P = .30 for patients who received paclitaxel every 3-4 weeks and P = .002, in favor of the placebo, for patients who received weekly paclitaxel); 3) the time to disease progression (P = .63); or 4) apparent toxicities. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any evidence of benefit in any particular subgroup. CONCLUSIONS The results from this study do not support the use of glutathione for the prevention of paclitaxel/carboplatin-induced CIPN.
机译:背景技术化学疗法诱导的周围神经病(CIPN)是紫杉烷和铂基化学疗法的显着副作用。几项研究支持了谷胱甘肽对预防铂诱导的CIPN的潜在益处。当前的试验旨在确定谷胱甘肽是否会因卡铂/紫杉醇疗法而预防CIPN。方法在2009年12月4日至2011年12月19日期间,共计185例接受紫杉醇和卡铂治疗的患者。患者随机接受安慰剂(n = 91)或1.5 g / m 2谷胱甘肽(n = 94)。化疗前超过15分钟。使用欧洲研究与治疗癌症生活质量组织(EORTC-QLQ)20个项目,CIPN特定(CIPN20)感官分量表和美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)对CIPN进行了评估,版本4.0。结果2个研究组之间在以下方面没有统计学上的显着差异:1)使用EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20(P = .21)和CTCAE量表(≥2级,P = .449)评估的周围神经毒性神经毒性;对于≥2级神经病变的发展时间,P = .039,有利于安慰剂); 2)紫杉醇急性疼痛综合征的程度(对于每3-4周接受紫杉醇的患者,P = .30;对于每周接受紫杉醇的患者,P = .002,对安慰剂有利); 3)疾病进展的时间(P = 0.63);或4)明显的毒性。亚组分析未显示任何特定亚组受益的证据。结论本研究结果不支持使用谷胱甘肽预防紫杉醇/卡铂诱导的CIPN。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号