首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology >Despotic establishment of breeding colonies of greater flamingos,Phoenicopterus ruber, in southern Spain
【24h】

Despotic establishment of breeding colonies of greater flamingos,Phoenicopterus ruber, in southern Spain

机译:在西班牙南部大火烈鸟(Phoenicopterus ruber)繁殖殖民地的专制建立

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The spatial distribution of individuals fits an ideal despotic distribution (IDD) model when some individuals prevent others from settling in a high-quality habitat, so that the last group of individuals is forced to use lower-quality habitats in which their fitness is lower. A critical assumption of the IDD model is that individuals using the lower-quality habitats must have attempted to settle first in the better habitats, but this has seldom been demonstrated. We tested key assumptions of the IDD model by using long-term data on choice of breeding sites by greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus ruber) in southern Spain, where these birds breed at Fuente de Piedra lake (FP) and the Guadalquivir marshes (GM). Based on the accessibility of terrestrial predators to breeding sites, the FP colony was of better quality than the GM colony. As expected From an IDD model, the flamingos settled first at FP than at GM. The order of settlement was probably not affected by differences in food availability between sites, since in most years, the flamingos breeding in FP obtained food in GM during the chick-rearing period, once the FP lake dried up. Furthermore, breeding success was much higher at FP than at GM. Another assumption of the model is that individuals are omniscient and that they should try to settle first in the best site. We recorded 18 individually marked flamingos prospecting for nest sites in FP in a season, when many birds had already settled in this colony. The same individuals were subsequently recorded breeding in the same season in GM, indicating that they had previous information on the availability of sites on which to breed. A third assumption of the IDD model is that as the density increases in a given habitat, the fitness of individuals should decrease. In accordance with this, we found a strong effect of bird density on egg losses. The individuals that were recorded prospecting for sites in FP and that later bred in GM were younger than flamingos that were breeding in FP. We suggest that age-related behavioral dominance may be a mechanism responsible for this despotic distribution.
机译:当某些人阻止其他人安居在高质量的栖息地中时,个体的空间分布符合理想的专线分布(IDD)模型,因此最后一组个体被迫使用适应性较低的较低质量的栖息地。 IDD模型的一个关键假设是,使用劣质生境的个人必须首先尝试在较优生境中定居,但这很少得到证明。我们使用关于西班牙南部大火烈鸟(Phoenicopterus ruber)选择繁殖地的长期数据,对IDD模型的主要假设进行了测试,这些鸟在富恩特·德彼德拉湖(FP)和瓜达尔基维尔沼泽(GM)繁殖。根据陆地掠食者到繁殖地点的可及性,FP菌落的质量要好于GM菌落。不出所料从IDD模型中,火烈鸟在FP的位置比在GM的位置先沉降。定居点的顺序可能不受站点之间食物供应差异的影响,因为在大多数年份中,FP湖中的火烈鸟繁殖在雏鸡饲养期间在FP湖泊干period后获得了GM的食物。此外,FP的育种成功率比GM高。该模型的另一个假设是,个人是无所不知的,因此他们应该首先在最佳地点定居。我们记录了一个季节中有18只单独标记的火烈鸟在FP巢穴的前景,当时许多鸟类已经在该殖民地定居。随后记录了同一个人在同一季节在GM中繁殖的情况,这表明他们以前有繁殖地点可用信息。 IDD模型的第三个假设是,随着给定栖息地密度的增加,个体的适应度应降低。据此,我们发现禽类密度对鸡蛋损失有强烈影响。记录到在FP中有待勘探地点并在GM中繁殖的个体比在FP中繁殖的火烈鸟年轻。我们建议与年龄有关的行为优势可能是这种专长分布的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号