首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Brace or no-brace after ACL graft? Four-year results of a prospective clinical trial
【24h】

Brace or no-brace after ACL graft? Four-year results of a prospective clinical trial

机译:ACL移植后支撑还是不支撑?一项前瞻性临床试验的四年结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: A controversial discussion is held on using stabilizing knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. The current study investigated the influence of a stabilizing knee brace on results after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autografts. Methods: A prospective randomized study was started including 64 patients divided into two equal groups and treated with or without a stabilizing knee brace for 6 weeks post-operatively. A follow-up examination 4 years after operation comprised IKDC 2000, KT1000 measurement, a visual analogue pain scale (VAS; scores 0-10) and radiographic evaluation. The t test for independent and paired samples and the Pearson's Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05). The primary endpoint was the difference in IKDC classification. Results: Eighty-one per cent of the patients were examined 4 years post-operatively. IKDC 2000 subjective (brace group 90.5 ± 8.9, braceless group 93.2 ± 6.1) and objective results (brace A 30 %, B 56 %, C 16 %; braceless A 32 %, B 48 %, C 20 %) and instrumental measurement of anteroposterior laxity with KT1000 (brace 0.6 ± 2.4 mm, braceless 1.8 ± 3.4 mm) showed no significant differences. VAS pain results were significantly better in the braceless group at 1.0 ± 1.2 versus 1.9 ± 1.4 under sports activity or heavy physical work (p = 0.015). There were no radiographic differences concerning osteoarthritic findings and tunnel widening between the groups. Conclusion: Post-operative treatment with a stabilizing knee brace after ACL replacement showed no advantage over treatment without a brace at 4-year follow-up. The use of a knee-stabilizing brace after isolated ACL reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon graft is not recommended. Level of evidence: II.
机译:目的:关于在前交叉韧带(ACL)手术后使用稳定的膝关节矫治具争议性讨论。目前的研究调查了使用pa腱自​​体植骨重建ACL后稳定护膝对结果的影响。方法:开始一项前瞻性随机研究,将64例患者分为两组,并在术后6周内接受或不采用稳定的护膝进行治疗。术后4年的随访检查包括IKDC 2000,KT1000测量,视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS;评分0-10)和影像学评估。独立样本和配对样本的t检验和Pearson卡方检验用于统计学分析(p <0.05)。主要终点是IKDC分类的差异。结果:术后4年检查了81%的患者。 IKDC 2000主观(括号组90.5±8.9,无括号组93.2±6.1)和客观结果(括号A 30%,B 56%,C 16%;括号B 32%,B 48%,C 20%)和仪器测量KT1000的前后松弛度(支撑物0.6±2.4 mm,无支撑物1.8±3.4 mm)无显着差异。在体育锻炼或繁重的体力活动下,无支撑组的VAS疼痛结果在1.0±1.2时明显优于1.9±1.4(p = 0.015)。各组之间关于骨关节炎的发现和隧道拓宽没有影像学差异。结论:ACL置换术后使用稳定的膝关节支架进行术后治疗在4年的随访中比无支架的治疗无优势。不建议在使用自体pa骨腱移植物进行单独的ACL重建后使用膝盖稳定支架。证据级别:II。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号