首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Surgical repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: The cost-effectiveness of open versus percutaneous repair
【24h】

Surgical repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: The cost-effectiveness of open versus percutaneous repair

机译:跟腱断裂的手术修复:开放性与经皮修复的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Recent meta-analyses have shown reduced re-rupture rates for the surgical management of Achilles ruptures. However, percutaneous repair has been demonstrated to lead to improved function and patient satisfaction but greater complications than open repair. In the current economic climate, it is reasonable to consider the financial cost of rupture management for both the patient and the provider. The cost-effectiveness of operative treatment of ruptures of the Achilles tendon was determined based upon theatre occupancy, clinic attendance and cast changes, operative complications and functional assessment score. Methods: The cost-effectiveness of the surgical management of Achilles tendon ruptures between 2005 and 2011 in our unit was audited by comparing 49 patients receiving percutaneous repair to 35 patients whom had open repairs. Results: There was no significant difference in complications between the two surgical techniques: (Open vs. Percutaneous) overall rates 14.3 versus 10.4 %: infection; 2.7 versus 2.0 %, transient sural nerve damage: 5.6 versus 8.1 %, wound breakdown: 2.8 versus 0.0 %, re-rupture: 2.8 versus 2.0 %. Achilles Total Rupture Scores (ATRS) were comparable [Open 89 (65-100) at 49 months vs. Percutaneous 88.8 (33-100) at 12 months (n.s.)]. Theatre occupancy (P < 0.00) and hospital stay (P < 0.00) were significantly longer with open repair [43 min (26-70) and 2.9 days (0-4)] compared to percutaneous repair [15 min (12-43) and 1.2 days (0-2)]. Excluding the costs of running the operating theatre, we have estimated the costs of surgery for open repair to be £935 and percutaneous repair to be £574. Conclusions: This study suggests that percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon resulted in reduced costs and yet had comparable outcome and complications rates to open repair in surgical management of the Achilles tendon. Percutaneous repair should be considered as the primary method of cost-effective surgical management of Achilles tendon rupture. Level of evidence: A retrospective cohort study, Level III.
机译:目的:最近的荟萃分析显示,跟腱破裂的外科治疗中再破裂率降低。但是,经皮修复已被证明比开放式修复可改善功能和患者满意度,但并发症更大。在当前的经济形势下,考虑患者和提供者的破裂管理的财务成本是合理的。手术室跟腱断裂的手术治疗的成本效益是根据手术室的占用率,门诊就诊人数和演员表变化,手术并发症和功能评估评分确定的。方法:通过比较49例经皮修复的患者与35例进行开放性修复的患者,对我科2005年至2011年间跟腱断裂手术治疗的成本效益进行了评估。结果:两种手术技术之间的并发症没有显着差异:(开放与经皮)总感染率为14.3%至10.4%: 2.7对2.0%,短暂腓肠神经损伤:5.6对8.1%,伤口破裂:2.8对0.0%,再破裂:2.8对2.0%。跟腱总断裂分数(ATRS)相当[49个月时打开89(65-100),而12个月时经皮88.8(33-100)(n.s.)]。与经皮修复[15分钟(12-43)”相比,开放式修复[43分钟(26-70)和2.9天(0-4)]的剧院占用时间(P <0.00)和住院时间(P <0.00)明显更长。和1.2天(0-2)]。除去手术室的运营费用,我们估计开放式修复的手术费用为935英镑,经皮修复的费用为574英镑。结论:这项研究表明,对跟腱进行经皮修复可降低成本,但与跟腱手术治疗中的开放修复相比,其结果和并发症发生率相当。经皮修复应被视为经济有效的跟腱断裂手术治疗的主要方法。证据水平:回顾性队列研究,III级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号