首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients: Comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system
【24h】

Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients: Comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system

机译:骨关节炎患者的膝关节功能性屈伸轴:使用导航系统在体内与经上icon轴的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: No study, up to now, has examined the effect of arthritis on pathologic subjects using functional flexion axis (FFA). The purpose of this study is to understand whether arthritis affects somehow the FFA evaluation and to assess whether the FFA could be considered a usable reference for implant positioning for osteoarthritic knees. Methods: Using a navigation system, FFA orientation was evaluated intraoperatively (computed with the mean helical axis method) in three different ranges of motion (0°-120°; 35°-80°; 35°-120°) and in two different planes (coronal and axial), for 111 osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The results were compared with a control group of 60 patients that underwent ACL reconstruction. The angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and FFA was computed. Results: Results showed in arthritic knees on frontal plane, an average difference between TEA and FFA of -2.8° ± 5.0° while on axial plane it was 0.6° ± 4.7°. No statistical difference was found between the three ranges in axial view, whereas some difference was found in frontal view (P < 0.0001). The TEA-FFA angle was not correlatedwith limb alignment on axial plane, while it was, even if poor, in frontal plane. In the control group, in frontal and in axial view, no statistical difference was found for the angle between TEA and FFA. Conclusions: FFA can be used as reference for implant positioning in axial plane also in pathologic knees, while for the frontal plane further investigations are required.
机译:目的:迄今为止,尚无研究使用功能性屈伸轴(FFA)检查关节炎对病理受试者的影响。这项研究的目的是了解关节炎是否以某种方式影响FFA评估,并评估FFA是否可以被认为是骨关节炎膝盖植入物定位的有用参考。方法:使用导航系统,在三个不同的运动范围(0°-120°; 35°-80°; 35°-120°)和两个不同的运动范围内,对FFA方向进行术中评估(用平均螺旋轴法计算)平面(冠状和轴向),用于111名接受全膝关节置换术的骨关节炎患者。将结果与接受ACL重建的60例对照组进行比较。计算跨icon轴(TEA)和FFA之间的角度。结果:结果显示在额膝关节的关节炎膝盖上,TEA和FFA之间的平均差为-2.8°±5.0°,而在轴向平面上的平均差为0.6°±4.7°。在轴向视图的三个范围之间没有发现统计差异,而在正视图中发现了一些差异(P <0.0001)。 TEA-FFA角与轴平面上的肢体对齐无关,即使在额叶平面中也很差。在对照组中,在正视图和轴向视图中,TEA和FFA之间的角度均无统计学差异。结论:FFA可作为病理膝关节在轴向平面内植入物定位的参考,而对于额骨平面则需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号