首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Contact area and pressure in suture bridge rotator cuff repair using knotless lateral anchors.
【24h】

Contact area and pressure in suture bridge rotator cuff repair using knotless lateral anchors.

机译:使用无结侧向锚钉修复缝合桥肩袖的接触面积和压力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the use of knotless lateral anchors in a suture bridge construct produces better contact area and pressure parameters than a suture bridge construct with standard lateral anchors that require knots or a double-row repair. The hypothesis was that knotless lateral anchors would produce better contact area and pressure parameters than the other two constructs. METHODS: A total of fifteen matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders were divided into three groups. In Group 1, a suture bridge using knotless anchors for the lateral row was performed on five shoulders. A suture bridge using standard lateral row anchors that require knots was performed on the contralateral shoulders. In Group 2, suture bridge with knotless lateral row anchors was compared with double-row repair. In Group 3, suture bridge using standard lateral row anchors was compared with double-row repair. The contact conditions of the rotator cuff footprint were measured using pressure-sensitive film. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between any of the techniques regarding contact area F(2, 15.7) = 3.09, P = 0.07 or mean contact pressure F(2, 15.1) = 2.35, P = 0.12. A post hoc power analysis suggests differences between techniques are likely less than 91-113 mm(2) for area and 0.071-0.089 N for pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The use of knotless anchors in the lateral row of a suture bridge repair did not increase the footprint contact area or contact pressure when compared to a suture bridge repair requiring knots laterally or to a double-row repair.
机译:目的:评估与使用需要打结或双排修复的标准横向锚的缝合桥结构相比,在缝合桥结构中使用无结横向锚是否产生更好的接触面积和压力参数。假设是,无结的横向锚将比其他两种构造产生更好的接触面积和压力参数。方法:将十五对配对的尸体肩膀分为三组。在第1组中,在五个肩部进行了一个使用无结锚的外侧行缝合线桥。在对侧肩膀上进行了使用需要打结的标准侧行锚的缝合桥。在第2组中,将具有无结侧行锚的缝合桥与双行修复进行了比较。在第3组中,将使用标准侧行锚钉的缝合桥与双行修复进行了比较。使用压敏膜测量肩袖足迹的接触条件。结果:在任何技术上,接触面积F(2,15.7)= 3.09,P = 0.07或平均接触压力F(2,15.1)= 2.35,P = 0.12在统计学上无显着差异。事后功率分析表明,技术之间的差异对于面积而言可能小于91-113 mm(2),对于压力而言则小于0.071-0.089N。结论:与需要横向打结或双排修复的缝合桥修复相比,在缝合桥修复的横向排中使用无结锚固不会增加足迹接触面积或接触压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号