首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Do physical diagnostic tests accurately detect meniscal tears?
【24h】

Do physical diagnostic tests accurately detect meniscal tears?

机译:物理诊断测试是否可以准确检测到半月板撕裂?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Numerous physical tests have been described but their diagnostic accuracy is often questioned. Karachalios et al. described the new 'Thessaly test' and concluded that it could be safely used as a first line screening test for the selection of patients who need arthroscopic meniscal surgery. Our objective was to study the role of physical diagnostic tests in screening for meniscal tears and to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the Thessaly test. We examined 109 patients (80 male, 29 female; average age: 39 years; range: 16-56) who were presented with a history suggestive of a meniscal tear. Joint line tenderness, McMurray's test, and the Thessaly test were assessed by an independent investigator blinded to any imaging data in all patients. MRI and subsequent arthroscopy results were then collated. Our study showed a much lower diagnostic accuracy for the Thessaly test (61% for medial meniscus and 80% for lateral meniscus). It is comparable to McMurray's test (57% for medial meniscus and 77% for lateral meniscus). The Joint line tenderness test has a far superior diagnostic accuracy (81% for medial meniscus and 90% for lateral meniscus). However, combining the joint line tenderness test with McMurray's test or the joint line tenderness test with Thessaly test further increased the accuracy of physical diagnosis of meniscal tears. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected 96% of meniscal tears. Physical tests may not always be diagnostic of meniscal tears. MRI and arthroscopy may be essential in dubious clinical presentations and especially where more than one pathology is suspected. Our study showed that the Thessaly test in isolation was not useful for the detection of meniscal tears but it helps to increase diagnostic certainty when combined with other standard tests.
机译:已经描述了许多物理测试,但是它们的诊断准确性经常受到质疑。 Karachalios等。描述了新的“色萨利测试”并得出结论,它可以安全地用作选择需要关节镜半月板手术的患者的一线筛查测试。我们的目标是研究物理诊断测试在筛查半月板撕裂中的作用,并验证Thessaly测试的诊断准确性。我们检查了109位患者(平均年龄:39岁;范围:16-56岁),这些患者的病史提示有半月板撕裂。联合线压痛,McMurray检验和Thessaly检验由独立的研究人员评估,该研究人员不知道所有患者的任何影像数据。然后核对MRI和随后的关节镜检查结果。我们的研究显示,Thessaly测试的诊断准确性要低得多(内侧半月板为61%,外侧半月板为80%)。它与McMurray的测试相当(内侧半月板为57%,外侧半月板为77%)。关节线压痛测试的诊断准确性要高得多(内侧半月板为81%,外侧半月板为90%)。但是,将关节线压痛测试与McMurray的测试结合或将关节线压痛测试与Thessaly测试相结合,可以进一步提高对半月板撕裂进行物理诊断的准确性。磁共振成像(MRI)检测到96%的半月板撕裂。体格检查不一定能诊断出半月板撕裂。 MRI和关节镜检查在可疑的临床表现中可能是必不可少的,尤其是在怀疑有多种病理的情况下。我们的研究表明,单独的Thessaly测试对检测半月板撕裂没有帮助,但与其他标准测试结合使用时,有助于提高诊断的确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号