首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >PMH 9907: Long-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Phase 3 Study of Short-Term Bicalutamide Hormone Therapy and Dose-Escalated External-Beam Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
【24h】

PMH 9907: Long-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Phase 3 Study of Short-Term Bicalutamide Hormone Therapy and Dose-Escalated External-Beam Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

机译:PMH 9907:短期比卡鲁胺激素治疗和局部前列腺癌剂量递增的体外放射治疗的随机第3期研究的长期结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The role of hormone therapy (HT) with dose-escalated external-beam radiotherapy (DE-EBRT) in the treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC) remains controversial. The authors report the long-term outcome of a phase 3 study of DE-EBRT with or without HT for patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC). METHODS: From 1999 to 2006, 252 of an intended 338 patients with LPC were randomized to receive DE-EBRT with or without 5 months of neoadjuvant and concurrent bicalutamide 150 mg once daily. The study was closed early because of contemporary concerns surrounding bicalutamide. The primary outcome was biochemical failure (BF) incidence, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and quality of life. The BF and OS rates were estimated using the cumulative incidence function and Kaplan-Meier methods and were compared using the Gray test and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Eleven patients were excluded from analysis. Characteristics were well balanced in each treatment arm. Ninety-five percent of patients had IRPC. The prescribed dose increased from 75.6 grays (Gy) in 42 fractions to 78 Gy in 39 fractions over the period. At a median follow-up of 9.1 years, 98 BFs occurred, with no significant effect of HT versus no HT on the BF rate (40% vs 47%; P=.32), the OS rate (82% vs 86%; P=.37), the LC rate (52% vs 48 %; P=.32) or quality of life, in the patients who completed the questionnaires. Dose escalation to 75.6 Gy versus >75.6 Gy reduced the BF rate by 26% (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: For patients who predominantly have IRPC, the addition of HT to DE-EBRT did not significantly affect BF, OS, or LC. Bicalutamide appeared to be well tolerated. The conclusions from the study are limited by incomplete recruitment. (C) 2016 American Cancer Society.
机译:背景:激素治疗(HT)与剂量递增外照射(DE-EBRT)在治疗中危前列腺癌(IRPC)中的作用仍存在争议。作者报告了DE-EBRT联合或不联合HT治疗局部前列腺癌(LPC)的3期研究的长期结果。方法:从1999年至2006年,在338名LPC患者中,有252名被随机分配接受DE-EBRT联合或不联合5个月新辅助治疗,并同时接受比卡鲁胺150 mg每天一次。由于有关比卡鲁胺的当代担忧,该研究提早结束。主要结果是生化衰竭(BF)发生率,次要终点是总体生存(OS),局部控制(LC)和生活质量。使用累积发生率函数和Kaplan-Meier方法估算高炉和OS率,并使用格雷检验和对数秩检验进行比较。结果:11例患者被排除在分析之外。每个治疗组的特征均得到很好的平衡。 95%的患者患有IRPC。在此期间,处方剂量从42份的75.6灰度(Gy)增加到39份的78 Gy。在9.1年的中位随访中,发生了98次高炉,而HT与无HT对高炉率无显着影响(40%比47%; P = .32),OS率(82%对86%; P = .32)。 P = .37),完成调查表的患者的LC率(52%vs 48%; P = .32)或生活质量。剂量升高至75.6 Gy与> 75.6 Gy相比,BF率降低了26%(P = .004)。结论:对于主要患有IRPC的患者,在DE-EBRT中添加HT不会显着影响BF,OS或LC。比卡鲁胺似乎耐受良好。该研究的结论受到招聘不完全的限制。 (C)2016美国癌症学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号