...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology >Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator in a patient with suspected acute myocardial infarction: A decision analysis.
【24h】

Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator in a patient with suspected acute myocardial infarction: A decision analysis.

机译:链激酶和组织纤溶酶原激活剂对可疑急性心肌梗死患者的溶栓治疗:决策分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two commonly used thrombolytic agents are streptokinase (SK) and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), which have different impacts on the incidence of mortality and thrombolysis-related acute intracranial hemorrhage. A decision-analytic model was developed to compare the use of SK and t-PA in the treatment of a patient with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The outcome was health-related quality of life as quantified in a measure of utility from the patient's point of view. The model included three outcome states: death, nonfatal yet disabling stroke, and survival with no disabling stroke. The utility for disabling stroke was determined relative to the reference states of no disabling stroke (1.00) and death (0.00) by means of the time trade-off estimation technique. Probabilities were derived from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Artery trial, which revealed that although administering t-PA results in a lower percentage of deaths compared to SK, it may lead to a higher percentage of strokes. A decision tree was constructed to model the options and outcomes. The tree was analyzed by standard decision analytic techniques using SMLTREE software, and the stability of the results was examined as values of parameters were varied systematically in a sensitivity analysis. In the baseline analysis, SK yielded 0.9235, whereas t-PA yielded 0.9329. The sensitivity analysis revealed that if the probability of a disabling stroke attributable to t-PA were greater than 2.08%, SK would yield the higher expected utility. This threshold value, however, was much greater than the probability established in major trials. The administration of t-PA leads to a slightly better outcome than does the administration of SK in a patient with suspected AMI.
机译:两种常用的溶栓剂是链激酶(SK)和组织纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA),它们对死亡率和溶栓相关的急性颅内出血的发生率有不同的影响。建立了决策分析模型,以比较SK和t-PA在可疑急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中的使用。结果是与健康相关的生活质量,从患者的角度衡量实用性。该模型包括三个结果状态:死亡,非致死性致残性中风和无致残性中风的生存率。通过时间折衷估算技术,相对于无致残性卒中(1.00)和死亡(0.00)的参考状态确定了致残性卒中的效用。概率来自于封闭性冠状动脉的链激酶和组织纤溶酶原激活物的全球利用试验,该试验显示,尽管与SK相比,施用t-PA导致的死亡百分比更低,但它可能导致更高的中风百分比。建立了一个决策树来对选项和结果进行建模。通过使用SMLTREE软件的标准决策分析技术对树进行分析,并在敏感性分析中系统地更改参数值,从而检查结果的稳定性。在基线分析中,SK得0.9235,而t-PA得0.9329。敏感性分析表明,如果归因于t-PA的致残性中风的可能性大于2.08%,SK将产生更高的预期效用。但是,该阈值远大于大型试验中确定的概率。在怀疑患有AMI的患者中,t-PA的使用比SK的使用效果更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号