...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology >Authors' Reply
【24h】

Authors' Reply

机译:作者的回信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In their letter to the editor, Drs. Turgut and Tandogan [1] point out different essential aspects of the usage of beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Important questions have been answered by our and other studies in the past, but we agree that some questions remain to be addressed in the future by large, randomized trials.beta-Blocker treatment for hypertension has been widely questioned in the recent past [2] and they are no longer generally recommended as first-line treatment for hypertension. In our study the odds ratio for major adverse cardiac events was 0.59 for patients pre-treated with beta-blockers and 0.66 for those receiving them after hospitalization [3]. While we demonstrated a favorable in-hospital outcome for patients in these two groups (groups A and B in the original publication), beta-blocker use did not translate into a reduction of the 12-month mortality in the AMIS Plus (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) population. Thus, our results should not be understood as call for chronic use of beta-blockers in patients at risk for ACS.
机译:在给编辑的信中,Dr。 Turgut和Tandogan [1]指出了急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者使用β受体阻滞剂的不同基本方面。过去,我们的研究和其他研究已经回答了重要问题,但是我们同意,将来仍有一些问题需要通过大型随机试验来解决。过去,β-Blocker治疗高血压的研究受到了广泛质疑[2]并且不再推荐将它们作为高血压的一线治疗药物。在我们的研究中,接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者中主要不良心脏事件的比值比为0.59,住院后接受抗凝剂的患者为0.66 [3]。虽然我们证明了这两组患者(原始出版物中的A组和B组)的住院结局均良好,但使用β-受体阻滞剂并不能降低AMIS Plus(急性心肌梗死)的12个月死亡率。在瑞士)人口。因此,我们的结果不应被理解为呼吁在有ACS风险的患者中长期使用β受体阻滞剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号