...
首页> 外文期刊>Berichte uber Landwirtschaft >Bioenergy potential in Germany - studies in comparison.Original Title Potenzial von Bioenergie in Deutschland - Studien im Vergleich.
【24h】

Bioenergy potential in Germany - studies in comparison.Original Title Potenzial von Bioenergie in Deutschland - Studien im Vergleich.

机译:德国的生物能源潜力-比较研究原始名称德国的生物能源潜力-比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years there has been a multitude of scientific studies on the medium-term potential of bioenergy in the areas of heat, power and fuel generation. Beyond the general statement that the importance of bioenergy will increase in the future the results of these analyses clearly vary, particularly because of the differences in the underlying assumptions. Hence, the aim of this contribution is to compare three important studies on potential with each other, on the one hand to contribute to a better assessability of the bioenergy potential in Germany, on the other hand to indicate the importance of considering the context of the studies in the public discussion. The chosen studies are the "Pilot study 2008" by Nitsch (29), the "Material flow analysis for sustainable and energetic use of biomass" by Fritsche et al. (15) and the study "Bioenergy and decentralised energy supply" by Hauff, Haag and Zywietz (20). The comparison is carried out on the basis of the assumed resource base, the concept of sustainability, the assumptions about the economic and population development, the underlying rates of technical progress as well as the considered political framework. It can be shown that the results of the studies differ only little with regard to the biomass potential. When considering the bioenergy potential in the areas of heat, power and fuel generation, however, the results of the studies vary much more. While the biomass potential is influenced above all by the assumed resource base, the population development and the technical progress, the bioenergy potential is particularly affected by the technologies and systems used as well as by the political framework.
机译:近年来,在热能,发电和燃料产生领域,对生物能源的中期潜力进行了大量科学研究。除了一般性的声明,即未来生物能源的重要性将增加之外,这些分析的结果明显不同,尤其是由于基本假设的差异。因此,这项贡献的目的是将三项重要的潜力研究进行相互比较,一方面有助于更好地评估德国的生物能源潜力,另一方面表明必须考虑环境的重要性。在公开讨论中学习。选择的研究是Nitsch(29)的“ Pilot study 2008”,Fritsche等人的“可持续利用生物质的物料流分析”。 (15)和Hauff,Haag和Zywietz(20)的研究“生物能源和分散式能源供应”。比较是在假定的资源基础,可持续性的概念,对经济和人口发展的假设,技术进步的基本速度以及所考虑的政治框架的基础上进行的。可以证明,研究结果在生物量潜力方面只有很小的差异。但是,当考虑热,电和燃料产生领域的生物能源潜力时,研究结果相差很大。尽管生物量潜力首先受到假定的资源基础,人口发展和技术进步的影响,但生物能源潜力尤其受所使用的技术和系统以及政治框架的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号